"At some point you're going to have to accept that the vast majority of scientists accept that climate change is real and that the vast majority of people who deny the reality of climate change are not scientists and have misunderstood the science."
Like I said, I never said Climate change isn't 'real'. The dispute is how much the climate is changing and what is causing it.
The vast majority of climate scientists:
1) It would be career-suicide to express any other opinion about climate change besides the current narrative. Many have already been fired for doing so. I was in Academia for many years and pretty much everything has to do with politics.
2) Rely on the same sets of data. Confirmation bias is a real thing. If you even bothered to look at the website I mentioned, you would see that some of the main studies used for climate change proof are not peer-reviewed.
If 'science' means research without peer-review, completely invalid studies, the refusal to admit studies that are wrong, silencing opposition, and using politics to bully the opposition, I will agree.
However, this isn't science and if it was just science as you say, we wouldn't have politics, lying, and outright fraud involved in so many instances.
Al Gore, for instance, is now a wealthy man for essentially getting laws passed to force companies to buy carbon credits from his own companies. He pushed 'Global Warming' as 'Settled science' and the science community accepted it.
The pope came out a few months back and backed climate change. Everyone pointed to this as some sort of proof. They ignored the fact that the pope also talked about how trans-gender people are not seen as human in the eyes of god.
If you can't see the problem here, you don't really understand science yourself.