[0] That's the brand name, it's not really truly ergonomic, or at least not as designed for ergonomics as a Kinesis. Homepage/store: http://www.trulyergonomic.com
[0] That's the brand name, it's not really truly ergonomic, or at least not as designed for ergonomics as a Kinesis. Homepage/store: http://www.trulyergonomic.com
I've got tons of keyboard notes: http://thespanishsite.com/public_html/org/ergo/keyboards.htm...
And I wrote a small blog on Ergonomic keyboards:
https://h4labs.wordpress.com/2015/07/16/the-model-01-an-heir...
For something we use 8-20 hours a day, keyboards should evolve a little more.
I've read so many RSI stories it's scary:
http://markmcb.com/2014/10/13/severe-hand-rsi-pain-and-recov...
One thing I liked was the separate arrow keys (though the duplicate didn't make much sense). I barely ever need the numpad but I can't live without the arrow keys (I don't even see how anyone who's not a vim user can).
I like how they advertise "100% of the keys in 60% of the space", when the majority of the space they save is the numpad... which isn't replicated in their keyboard. There's a number of odd choices with keys, probably the greatest of which is hiding 'insert' behind a function shift.
Also, why is that Windows key so accessible? That is what that diamond shaped icon is, right?