Hacker News Reader

Ummm... Me?

I had thought to mention it, but didn't want the thread to deviate to a morals discussion ;-)

Yeah, a later look had me wondering if I was reading too hard.

The whole discussion invites similar moralizing though, at least until the techniques are known to be very precise and safe.

Personally, I think aborting an embryo that will be born to live with serious defects or illnesses is the first answer, at least until embryonic genetic editing is viable in all cases.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com