20% is actually not a very large margin. Depending on how much your house cost, and how much your rent was, it may have actually been cheaper to rent.
20% is actually not a very large margin. Depending on how much your house cost, and how much your rent was, it may have actually been cheaper to rent.
Also, keep in mind that a landlord isn't entitled to profit just because they're attempting to make a profit. It is entirely possible (and it does happen in reality) that a certain rental market is such that the landlord will not be able to turn a profit or may in fact even lose money. Being a landlord is just like any other business -- it can fail.
Finally, rental markets are often just different. Here in Houston, I could not buy an apartment like the one I rent for the same price that I pay. There aren't many condo buildings for one thing, and the ones that do exist charge exorbitant monthly maintenance fees. These fees would bring the monthly cost of owning such a condo to about $500-$1000/month more than what I currently pay in rent. At the same time, any townhouse or SFH that I might buy which is larger than what I rent is naturally going to cost more -- often times significantly more. In other words, the rental market sometimes has options that don't exist in the for-sale market. (The opposite is of course true as well.)
If you can get rent for less than the monthly mortgage payment, then the landlord is basically subsidizing you to live there and it's a pretty great deal. Buying in those conditions is a sucker bet.
Where I live, in Paris, if you take a mortgage today for 20 years, your repayments are going to be around x2/x2.5 the monthly rent of the place. The returns on real estate are notoriously very low. That's because speculation and foreign investment drive prices up while rents can't really increase because the people who live in the flats are already spending 40-45% of their income on rent.
I live in a one-bedroom for which the rent is 1200€, and it would cost around 480,000€ to acquire. With a good interest rate on 20 years, that's 2600€ monthly repayment.
That is demonstrably not true if you just look at monetary costs. Buying often does not outperform renting and investing the remainder. Of course people value home ownership for reasons other than its financial value.
You are actually arguing that a house will fully depreciate in less time than it takes to pay for it. Well, it's not an extraordinary claim, but it's still not what I'd expect.
As I said, it's not an extraordinary claim.
I meant: maintenance is only more expensive than the acquisition if the good will completely depreciate during the time you are maintaining it.