Hacker News Reader

EDIT: Didn't see dang's comment. So I'm not sure.

I'm getting downvoted for even asking the question. Awesome.

Just because he was a bad poster doesn't mean he's an un-person.

Like I said, I don't mind either way. Just wondered what the official position was.

It appears there's a large number of people here who disagree with you.

I wonder which they disagreed with, was it the 'was a bad poster' or the 'is still a person' part.

That's really bad news if true. His perspective is crucial.

He earned it. I consider Michael an internet-friend, but I don't think that's defensible.