> It's quite absurd to assert that ELIZA from 1966 outperformed GPT-3.5.
They don't. The researchers ran a modern ELIZA implementation alongside the GPT models. They're not citing ELIZA results from 1966.
645 karma · joined January 31, 2012
They don't. The researchers ran a modern ELIZA implementation alongside the GPT models. They're not citing ELIZA results from 1966.
So the bill is well worth doing, just people stop writing unenforceable bs into contracts.
Not that we should give up and resign ourselves to outmoded received pedagogy, but these are hard breaking changes and we should set our expectations accordingly.
A very similar-sounding caste-system. Europe’s great and all but it isn’t Utopia.
Source for the confidence here? We know that a corvée economy existed, but I’m skeptical that we can rule out private quipo-based exchange. The evidence base is pretty thin; a lot of stuff didn’t survive Pizarro.
It’d be interesting to see a cost-benefit analysis of OIRA’s cost-benefit analysis. All the delays aren’t free.
I’m asking, as gently as I know how, if there’s anything here besides “because they’re Indians.” Because that’s not a very good reason.
To me that line reads as “some of our people fish a bit.”
> and be it further resolved, these waters are also claimed by the State of California, who through its California Natural Resources Agency Pathways to 30x30: Accelerating Conservation of California’s Nature Report, support the concept of Indigenous Marine Stewardship
Do you have any evidence pointing towards this being a money grab? That’s a serious accusation.
Interestingly the idea that tribal membership is based on ancestry originated with Europeans and (white) Americans, more than native tribes. Historically (generalizing wildly), tribal membership is about citizenship in a community much more than it is about who ones’ grandparents were. Blood quotient was a US legal concept that reflected the American fondness for racial categories. A Navajo friend has Scottish and Arab ancestors who’d married into the tribe, just to give an example. Or check out _The Unredeemed Captive_, for a practice that would make no sense if tribal membership were racial.
Communities often want to continue as communities, in a way that’s only possible with self-determination. That can land as either a left- or a right-flavored interest, depending on who’s asking and the overall context. But it’s too big a part of human nature to brush aside.
> anything with a wok, just doesn’t work with induction
López-Alt, in the article[1]:
> But for most wok cooking, you don’t need it. There’s plenty of homestyle dishes that don’t have that flavor. For my Wok book tour, I brought around an induction wok cooktop. And it works just fine.
> People have this idea that you can’t cook on a wok without a gas flame. But most of the recipes in my book work just fine without one.
So I think it’s totally fair to say he’d disagree. Not sure how you’d get “incorrect” out of that.
Everything has trade-offs. But on the whole, for most people, induction is going to be a step up over gas just purely as a cooking method. The air quality and climate benefits are a bonus.
Though not really for the population as a whole: the majority of people don’t have all that much in the way assets. The proposals that get floated in the US don’t kick in until your wealth is in the tens of millions.
Choice of law is anything but simple. Think of geographic scoping of laws as a rough rule of thumb sovereign states use to avoid annoying each other, rather than as a law of nature.
We'll have to see when the book's done, but a practical, techniques-and-skills focused approach to Haskell optimization seems like it could be a really good resource. There are plenty of other tutorials out there ready to explain how `foldl` evaluates one more time.
That’s interesting if true, but do you have a better source (ideally, a court case)? I don’t see that theory of liability discussed anywhere on the page you linked.
And just notice how often the writers mention not having enough food, or basic clothing. Then get back to us on the idea that slave owners would have taken even minimal care of slaves.
You’ve written how you think it ought to have worked. But that’s not how it actually worked.
A Jenga tower is in unstable equilibrium. Push it a little bit away from its resting configuration and it collapses.
The economy is in stable equilibrium, mostly, more or less. Push it by increasing the price of some commodity, which happens all the time, and buyers look for alternatives and efficiencies, which dampens the effect of the push. In all likelihood things settle in a new equilibrium not far at all from the first.
It’s a much more resilient system than you’re giving it credit for. Totally different dynamics than the party game.
Wanting to connect with important members and of your community it a perfectly normal human impulse, and finding or creating things the two of you have in common is often a very reasonable strategy towards that end. It goes badly at the scale of modern celebrity, is all.