Related to this: Instead of Hendonism, I am getting into Stoicism; of course adapting it to 'modern day'.
345 karma · joined January 31, 2012
Related to this: Instead of Hendonism, I am getting into Stoicism; of course adapting it to 'modern day'.
P.S: Literally paraphrasing my Engineering Professional Practice course. An exam of which I just crushed!
I can see something like this, if not already used, for propaganda.
Tin Foil hat is on
1. Some books have horrible formats. In the physical books, shitty formatted texts are not printed (hopefully) and fixed. 2. Too many filetypes and some books tend to be only in a particular format, hence creating a separation. Though this is easily remedied by using converters, it loses formatting sometimes.
I still prefer EBook reader for the convenience. However, a physical book is great. I find it better but I do not have a good reason as to why.
Good for them.
Edit: Although I understand localization is important, but perhaps we should favor English - an international language - over a localized one. Of course, one would say, it being international does not mean well adopted. Perhaps, we can use some sort of constants to assume a Country's acceptability of English and first make English the first choice; having localization as an option.
Interesting Anecdote: When I was a tiny little kid in India, we were forced to use the English version of Google so that we learn English as well as Computers at the same time. Sure Localization is more user friendly (and hence I understand it being there) but it is not a standard. After not surfing the web (or visiting other pages), 99% [1] of the applications/programs on the computer are not localized.
[1]: Bullshit number.
I think the only feedback would be to show sample usages and adding a bit more technical information*
[*] That would be understandable to people with basic encryption knowledge.
It's one thing about keeping a consistent UX vs following what, due to its nature, becomes a "standard" UI
We used itertools chains to write producers and consumer to create 'Chain' objects that process data exactly as the bonobo.Graph.
Can't wait to try this.
I think it would be doing a disservice to other students if they didn't switch. The rationale given was a great one actually. OOO is there for a reason. I do not like the idea that FP is the answer for everything.
I understand many students used Python, C++, etc. This was the case for me as well. I did not go to any lectures for the Introductory course. I spent my time wisely studying for other Engineering classes (in reality: I actually didn't do shit and did other activities). You should do the same too.
What I am trying to say is, just because you already know OOO because you took the initiative before University (which I think - and I am biased - is a good thing to do), does not mean everyone else has. University is about teaching a body of students, all of education revolves around the mean of this body of students. It is a sad fact, but no professor or department or University will give you the unique attention you deserve; this is why I would not suggest University for that purpose. I only did University to get a piece of paper. I learned most programming stuff on my own time, before going in.
Teaching OOO, an easier of the two (FP/OOO), is a good thing. And teaching it in Python.. is a great thing. Kudos to MIT
I think instead, it is a better idea to keep Python/OOO as first year and in second year start teaching FP in whatever language. Or perhaps teach them both in first year. I think we just need to realize that when we go to University/School, we will have to walk at the pace of the "mean" even if that requires having to run (to catch up) or crawl (to slow down). Sad reality.
Edit: I just noticed that if I press the post button twice, it makes two posts. I deleted the dupe.
I wish I was back home with my granddad and just farming sometimes. He is an awesome man but I cannot buy land in India anymore.
Edit: He used to manage an "Ashram" which was basically just a private little river facing house in a village. He maintained the bushes/trees/plants and all that jazz and just chilled. It was good. It was simple.
People will record the video differently hence, adding more complexity to solving, comparatively, a simple problem.
One person might do the movements really fast, which leads to blur, which would mean they now need to add de-blurring. Other person might even miss an angle that was required. I think this is likely why panoramas are made in parts.
Edit: add smiley face.
I skimmed through some of these video lectures, I wonder if I even should write books for this. Or simply href.
Thank you for the share. Will be of great help to me come summer.
As an example: We worked on something similar for a school project in Python, where you would simply write classes for each things, which would then create a JSON file.
In your case, might not be what you want if you do not want to tie to a single language though.
Just Curious: Whats the appeal here? Why did you all decide to work on this? What were (if at all) you using before this was made by you?
Regards,
Verbosity is sometimes good but in the context of this.. Where all you are doing is giving commands, giving them arguments... there are not so many things here that can lead to confusion.
If you had multiple arg fields I understand.
Again, preference :)
Have you tried Packing them? I have yet to experience this.
* Material design
* Apple-like design
* Dropbox-like design
Even when I goto Dribble, its the same thing, different colors.
And the worse thign is, even when I am designing something. I conform to that norm!
* Enable Developer Options
* Add Ublock package zip
* Enable in Incognito as well
TL;DR: Them removing it would be a dick move, but not end of the world. We can still install any packages we want.
Command to run should be just called command. And trigger rule can be just trigger no?
Maybe personal preference.
Easter Egg: "Bos in the house"
Regards,