zeofig

One of the reasons I try to avoid fast food and indeed everything.

Is correlated with*

It's a training data problem, and the training data you want doesn't exist.

That would be cool if I could afford to own a house.

It was never independent from day zero, since it was always going to be sold to M$OFT or other.

Yeah and then they can enjoy a future where the previous generation earned twice as much money which was itself worth twice as much. Have fun buying a house kids!

Absolutely agree.

That's rich. Almost as rich as Sam.

Maybe we just need to vibe harder?

A humorously underwhelming list.

Think about this for a second

E = MC^2 + AI

A new equation for physics?

The potential of AI is unlimited.

I'm gonna continue regular coding, hehe.

Because if they sold it at cost, nobody would buy it.

How about dating not being an app-fucked hellscape? That would help my dating anxiety.

I hope it comes back. Although I don't agree with a lot of what's on there, it's one of the only places you can find hot, fresh, (mostly) uncensored, and unalgorithmed content.

I'm so glad We have all Decided this Together and we can now Enjoy the Koolaid

Fandom and Fextralife are a blight on gaming.

but couldfix? noyoucouldntlol

I might win the lottery.

Glad someone said it. Unfortunately we are swimming against the tide...

Agreed, but it seems we're gonna ride the AI hype all the way to the "top".

A Markov process is a random process where the new state only depends on the old state, not anything else. This can be stretched to include almost anything, since you can expand the definition of the state to record history or whatever you want, although you may make the process much more difficult to work with mathematically. In other words, the fact that something may be a Markov process is generally not interesting, because it is a very broad definition, and doesn't guarantee any interesting properties without further assumptions.

The wavefunction in QM doesn't evolve randomly, so I would say it is not technically a Markov process. On the other hand you can create a theory of observables derived from QM that is "random" (depending on your interpretation of quantum mechanics).

If by adversaries you mean "allies", then they're way ahead of you.

>The author is the head of Microsoft AI. I'm disappointed but not surprised.

Build a strawman, knock him down, and plant the glorious flag of hyperbole on his strawwy corpse.

Why not just feed it random data? It's so smart that it will figure out which parts are random, so eventually you will generate some good data randomly, and it will feed on it, and become exponentially smarter exponentially fast.

I knew it.

Agi level my ass

Poor little bastards can't eat anything fun

Nobody's saying they should be killed. But I can't deny, at least to myself, what emotions might inadvertently well up within my soul (does Meta believe in souls?) if an unthinkable event like that you are hypothesising about were to happen. It's outside of my control.