Probably just apple not supporting anything web related as usual.
2,780 karma · joined July 10, 2013
Probably just apple not supporting anything web related as usual.
Still not seeing the point?
People are either gonna love or hate it. Love because of how little space it requires or hate because the performance is gonna be worse then even the non pro versions of the surface.
So much nonsense in a single paragraph, amazing.
If anything DNS is less centralized then http and SMTP. Its a surprisingly complicated system for what it does because of all the caching etc, but calling it more centralized then http is just is just ignorant to a silly degree
While the problem isn't inherently trivial, the issues the tooling can solve is, which is the order of startup and is usually solved with a waitforit startup script, as these services generally talk over network with each other.
The real challenges, like determining seed data etc is too project specific to be abstracted away.
Not to take away from your problem domain, it would be nice to have framework to use so the developers don't have to wire the plumbing for these automations manually anymore - it's just not going to solve the issue that developers will have to wait for the ci pipeline to get their results
And to experience it all over again with proper nvme drives was very enjoyable indeed. Cold boots in about 5s now vs 20-60s with the old ssds of back then really makes shutting down/starting up into a very different experience again
You can never be certain wherever the damage was caused by bitrot or a person screwing with the file, but certain patterns are very unlikely to occur naturally so a reasonable guess is at least somewhat possible
I can see that some people would prefer this aesthetic, even though i'd agree that having an admin panel with low information density is kinda pointless
While it's not what you're looking for, a lot of people also don't know that windows has a built-in copy paste history if you use windows+v instead of ctrl-v. That's quiet handy too, but a fast cry from what you've proposed there
You're still thinking in the framework of capitalism.
Let me be clear that I think that doing anything but capitalism is bound to fail while we're living in a resource restricted reality.
Nonetheless, if we want to think about it for arguments sake: there are no costs associated without capitalism, only necessary work and resources. It's really hard to think without the restrictions of capitalism for me, because that's the only way I've ever experienced and it's so effective at prioritizing resources and productivity. Anything else has historically always fallen short.
Though it's still a pretty fucked up and heartless system
I'm not aware of anything recent though, last fiasco I'm aware of was something around 2020 I think, though I doubt they changed
It might've been the suggested database, but that's as far as their relationship went
------
Copyright (c) <year> <copyright holders>
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.
This code is written to share revenue with the author after a threshold, but that's merely the application/code working as intended.
You're free to fork the code, remove this sharing and republish the dependency under another name for example, that's the only thing that MIT is about
the west is definitely wrong however, as there are wealthy nations all over the world
It's not trivial, but it's still easier then a space program
Or name me a single one that doesn't use at least https.
With chat apps it's a different story, because the end isn't the server in that case - but in the context of banking https is enough for e2ee
Most devs would obviously still use unreal engine etc, but these engines will be able to give you improved performance of your games by utilizing WASM
Why do any of your issues in any way contribute to the decision wherever someone should invest their time to create a migration tool so users can switch from the old legacy product to a free account which doesn't have any of the domain features to begin with?
I get that you're unhappy that Google discontinues their free service for you, but that wasn't what the discussion was about.
but the venn diagram overlap of people
* willing to pay for such a tool,
* not having switched to another provider since
* and not willing to start paying for it now
will be tinyI've heard that MongoDB has improved a lot over the years, so I really shouldn't have said that.
Anyway, to start of: why would you want a connection manager Middleware for a pet project? Do you honestly expect to need hundreds/thousands of simultaneous db connections?
The original replication does exactly what it was supposed to, but is not what developers often think they want, which is clearly the reason for your outrage. Clustering isn't easy, as mongodb continues to prove to day by making creation of them easy but then catastrophically fail in production under load as the countless post mortems show. I really doubt you're going to need it anyway for a pet project....