606 karma · joined February 19, 2020
Do you have link to that particular show? It's surprising it was mentioned and that Linus was still 'supporting' it at the time.
At least in some other cases, other teams are being spun up or being changed to take on these projects.
Of course, that doesn't mean this isn't disruptive or unfortunate.
AFAICT, Google didn't go to the effort of creating vague objectives for people to fail at. Instead they've blanket cut teams regardless of their success or performance.
Less than 5 years of experience at Google is, to be fair, common. But the company doubled in size over that time, so it's inevitable. And higher turn over in tech is common (and I don't think that is necessarily reflective of anything other than the fact it's easy to get another job as a software engineer).
I can't state much on the layoffs because my team was not heavily affected.
It's thick, being mostly fat (often >60%). At least in Cornwall, it's often bought in plastic tubs like ice cream (it will hold its shape, not flow), not jars or bottles.
For example, a watermark or logo is shown at the start of a broadcast containing product placement in the UK. Prior to 2011, it was 'forbidden' for broadcasters entirely. (Quotes because you could still broadcast films that may arguably have it)
Further, as of GDPR, you are entitled to all information from the agencies for free. Prior, you could obtain it for a small fee (£2 by post if my memory serves me correctly).
As far as I'm concerned, SCHUFA is basically a scam I am compelled to fall for whenever I want to rent somewhere.
But I have had some success in bypassing its moral posturing by asking it in German. It will happily translate for you afterwards.
Doesn't help when I _do_ want three of something though...
We talk about 'high energy' because there's an upper limit to speed (the speed of light), but there's no limit to how much energy something can have. The increase in energy increases mass and speed (and therefore momentum), with it mostly varying mass as you approach the speed of light.
A proton moving at 99.5% the speed of light is not moving much faster than one moving at 99%, but the former has much more energy.
They might say it in in-person conversations with their colleagues.
Yes there's a level of detachment that comes from being online, but the bigger distinction is more 'who' you are talking to.
Good thing space complexity is routinely discussed in these interviews.
And the idea that computation complexity only matters for 'the hot path' is way too dismissive.
For instance; a quadratic loop over a 10 million line log file is just a catastrophe (100 trillion iterations), even for something run once a day. Such a log file would happily fit into memory (it's mere gigabytes) and a hashmap would be perfectly adequete.
> Depending on how much traffic a service handles
Yes, it depends. The interviewee is expected to ask, or at least state what assumptions they're making.
It wouldn't even occur to me to go with the naive O(n^2) solution because it has such obvious drawbacks with large inputs.
And it's an interview question... yes, you're getting a No-Hire if you just leave it there. Although I personally would prompt you if you're not interviewing for a senior position.
Estimated users of Facebook: 3 billion. Meta annual revenue: $120 billion
3 billion × $200 is significantly more than Meta's annual revenue.
There's paying for a service and there's being ripped off.
So I would suppose 'inside' and 'outside' were also considered relative to the kerb.
It's possible, just not the norm.
(Sweet things indicate easily broken down sugars, a sub-category of energy rich)