There's also a Postgres contrib module called pg_test_fsync that tests various fsync modes on your hard drive, and if you get too high results, you can strongly suspect that the dist is lying.
1,457 karma · joined February 16, 2011
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/wulczer; my proof: https://keybase.io/wulczer/sigs/g46dYvOOsEpYFfTEQUY4Hwj5x_gO3JSvfDNXnd4pjvI ]
There's also a Postgres contrib module called pg_test_fsync that tests various fsync modes on your hard drive, and if you get too high results, you can strongly suspect that the dist is lying.
The game-changing point is that we're always gathering data at the same pace, even when you're not connected. This means that when you visit the page (or see read your daily report email), you'll see a datapoint for every event as it happened, like a visits spike during the night, or a sudden increase of CPU usage of your AWS machines.
* strong emphasis on real time
* continuous data gathering, regardless of whether you're connected
* good visual design
* useful daily reporting over email
* a HTTP API for submitting your own data
To see the first two points in action, you need a browser with websockets or with Flash. As for visual design, decide yourself, but our designer will be very offended if you won't love it (just joking, criticism encouraged, feedback appreciated).We're planning to launch a private beta in May, accepting invites now. Enjoy!
I loathe engineers who produce complex, unreadable code and have enough nerve to call that "cool". A great programmer knows when to refrain from saving two lines of code to spare the next person two hours of debugging.
Programmers needing wingmen that clean up after them are in my opinion simply jerks. It's a sign of disrespect towards their coworkers and a sign of a lack of an important skill.
Jumping from people with less economical stability who don't advance because they "spend the bulk of their time trying not to offend" and "don't offer suggestions when in meetings" to brutal authority of bigoted conservatism is a stretch.
In my book, people who act natural, take initiative and get things done deserve to advance. People who are withdrawn and only interested in keeping their jobs don't. And on the other hand smack-average performers don't get noticed and advanced, while silent and shy types, if they're doing a stellar job, do.
Maybe it's specific to the technology field, but I never noticed that one's financial wealth, or lack of it, influenced their carrer path.
edit: typos
Slowly admitting that Google Buzz was a complete failure...
A hiring strategy for Google (and one I believe they're following, judging by the calls my friends are getting) is combing places like development mailing lists or open source projects contributors and proposing these people jobs. I'd say that's how they get their rock stars.
And for people that are not destined to lead teams or research groups, they're simply doing what any large company does: have a HR department and hire folks that pass the filters, then evaluate them while they're there.
Disclaimer: I'm not comparing, just pointing out that the FSF's reaction is kind of attacking the straw man here.