Maybe they didn't obtain performance licenses though?
949 karma · joined October 14, 2014
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/wrigby; my proof: https://keybase.io/wrigby/sigs/MdiYCR9-ieNbkrRSq38cl5kTsYb0FPgkJhNFC0C0ZWA ]
Maybe they didn't obtain performance licenses though?
Disclaimer: IANAL, and with big artists, publishing deals can be very very different from boilerplate.
So yes, the file would get fetched, but no, it can't affect the page being rendered by the browser.
The Virginia state schools are very inexpensive for the quality, and I did two years in the community college system and then transferred to James Madison with guaranteed admission (because of agreements between the state universities and the community college). JMU wasn't a noteworthy CS school at the time, but I also had the option to head to Virginia Tech or University of Virginia, both of which have great programs (JMU offered a minor in music business, which is what made my decision).
Tuition was <$4k/semester for residents at the time (class of 2011).
I think CSS, JS, and images are cached - HTML is not.
It's also my understanding that book titles are not protected under trademark law, except for the title of a series, so The Lord of The Rings could be trademarked, but not The Notebook.
A real-life example: The Notebook (the book) was published in 1996. The Notebook (the movie) was released eight years later, in 2004. With a seven year copyright, the book would be in public domain, and the author may not see a dime from the movie. Is that fair? Is paying the author of the book royalties from the film's revenue a burdensome cost to society? I assert that the author of the book should be able to earn money from the wildly successful film adaptation of his movie, whether he's directly involved with the production of the film or not.
I'm sure there are a lot of subtle technicalities I'm missing, but I think the core of this argument stands.
I'm in favor of reducing the duration of copyright, but I think something in the region of 30 years is a more reasonable amount of time than 7 years.
Regarding the constitution, I think that the means of promoting creation of new works is the ability for creators to profit off of their works. By reducing the potential for profit, you reduce the incentive to create. I can see how overly-restrictive copyright law can inhibit creativity, but I think a 7 year period swings too far in the opposite direction.
I'm curious to know if people with families have a different experience with it than single people. I'm a single guy in my mid 20's, and I suspect that if I was married and had kids at home the experience would be more positive.
On the other hand, the Allen & Heath GLD has its meters labeled differently, and I'm not quite sure what they're referenced to (they go up to +12). This can be a bit frustrating, since I never know how close I am to digital clipping, but in practice I aim to get everything around 0 dB on the meters and I have at least 12 dB of headroom.
Wikipedia has a neat list[2] of different analog reference levels for 0 dBFS.
1: Pro Tools metering - http://i.imgur.com/YcUBR6H.png
1: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a8/Gray_cod...
2: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gray_code#Position_encoders
I'm going to have a run at reproducing this in Python. Should be fun!
While a GPS outage is a minor inconvenience for most of us, it could be pretty catastrophic for spacecraft if they didn't have another position reference.
EDIT: See below - I was off; they're just attitude, not position
Most venues will also either give you or sell you (for $1) a pair of foam earplugs at the bar. Do it.
The amount of throughput that fiber achieves over huge distances is incredible. It's amazing how easy it is to move 100+ gbps between two cities over a single 2-core fiber run.
It's a slippery slope of optimization that only works when you control the OS (or drivers at least) and the hardware together, but one slip-up can be catastrophic.
1: http://qz.com/418769/theres-still-plenty-of-money-in-dumb-ph... (disclaimer: it was really just one of the first results when I searched for a comparison of feature phone vs smartphone market share)
Saying that the iPhone is a small minority of phones is similar to saying that Tesla will have a small minority of vehicle sales, which is undoubtedly true, but doesn't portray the reality that a ton of other car manufacturers will be selling electric cars.