(← JupyterLite Notebook doing words embedding in the browser : don't try to run this on a smartphone !)
Does anyone know how to nicely visualize the poster child of words embeddings ?
203 karma · joined June 4, 2011
(← JupyterLite Notebook doing words embedding in the browser : don't try to run this on a smartphone !)
Does anyone know how to nicely visualize the poster child of words embeddings ?
https://freddiedeboer.substack.com/p/why-selection-bias-is-t...
Cf. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71878354/constraint-prog...
For now, I could not find anything satisfactory, so any recommendation would be most welcome. Otherwise, I guess I'll have to generate a variable for each tuple and use and all_different (e.g. https://cpmpy.readthedocs.io/en/latest/api/expressions/globa... ) on those.
OTOH, giving proper (i.e. often involuntary) treatment for violent mental illnesses would for sure improve the situation.
http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/110873/1/Working_Paper_67.pdf
EDIT: See also https://edi.opml.co.uk/wpcms/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Kyrg...
Going through "A tutorial on Thompson Sampling" and being eager to hone my skills in Clojure, I would be very interested in reading this code if there would be a repository online or a gist you could share with us.
Best Regards.
I don't understand your concept of something "existing" or not. Do you believe that a "speed" exist ? That a "center of gravity" exists ? That a "temperature" exist ? People who say "IQ is what IQ tests measure" sound to me like they could say "temperature is what thermometers measure". temperature does not "exist" it is molecules movements all the way down, yet it is a meaningful/useful concept. Same goes for IQ or "g factor".
Wrt to whether differences are biologically based or not, I'm convinced that one day, we'll look back at the Nature vs Nuture debate like we do with the Particule vs Wave debate for light. The sooner the better.
As to which part was so offensive, it's akin to wonder which spells got the witch burning at the stake. Witnessing so many smart and compassionate people join the angry mob really scared me : I have no reason to believe that I would not do the same if the right buttons were pushed.
- fairness & lack of prejudice wrt minorities/women : goal
- minorities/women % in the workforce : metric
- diversity hiring : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Campbell%27s_law because https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berkson%27s_paradox .
- without diversity hiring, differences in women vs men applicants pools, which can be explained by differences in *distributions* of interests, have no impact on distribution of skills in the workforce
- women are talented enough so that they just need to be *attracted* (e.g. better work/life balance) rather than pity-hired
This is my takeaway from the "screed". How could it be framed as «anti-diversity», much less «alt-right» ?
How could saying that «women are, on average more people-oriented and men are more thing-oriented» be framed as «women are inferior, biologically incapable of coding» ?
I hope that people get punished for such a dishonest character assassination !Reverse discrimination is the easy way, but it is actually counterproductive in term of reducing biases. As case of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Campbell%27s_law imo, of optimizing the easy metric of enrollment ratio instead of the hard goal of fairness.
I do not believe that the author of the memo ever wrote anything like that. I'm not sure that you should equate all research scientists who published on gender/sex differences with nazis.
But 'intertwined' means correlation, not causation. Being a woman is correlated with not doing software dev. in a tech company. It does not mean that tech discriminate against women, because correlation ≠ causation.
I would have sworn that this would be "Not being sexist 101", but apparently words do not mean what I think they should…
I do not understand how what he actually advocates could be considered discriminatory. It seems to me that it would indeed "disproportionately affect particular demographics", but in a good way by making sure that no https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berkson%27s_paradox could induce any skill/gender bias in the workforce.
[0] I have no particular knowledge about ukip
Actually, he wrote exactly the opposite.
I use this to modify the parameters of the composite geometric transformations of fractals. This allows me to generate animations for any kind of fractals without having to reimplement the animation code for each fractal : https://scientific-coder.github.io/Playground/2017-03-20-fra... (cf stepify multi-method). This would be useful for web servers in Clojure as we could have our cake and eat it too : while currently one has to pick either easy with ring handlers that are simple function compositions and vectors of interceptors for pedestal that can be modified at runtime.
I have not found the time yet to actually write the blog post, but my take would be more like :
https://scientific-coder.github.io/Playground/2017-03-20-fra...