233 karma · joined January 13, 2023
Nonsense. As a country, Americans know practically nothing about our history at all. Furthermore, Americans know practically nothing about the alternatives that exist elsewhere. This is glaringly obvious to virtually everyone who interacts with even small aggregate samples of average Americans. I wish you were right, but I'm afraid your thesis just falls flat on its' face.
I will gladly get in line to trash talk American post-war urban development, but even if average Americans shared our disposition, it's pretty naive to think average Americans' opinions would have any meaningful influence politically.
The policy has been good for workers in Germany, and might be the best example of how universal material demands for (actual) worker power are extremely popular in practice. Not even the most conservative German politician would dare challenge the policy in public.
It is, nonetheless, unsustainable. Without the threat of the Soviet Union, pro-worker legislation is losing its necessity in legitimating the Western ruling class. Once its founding generation is gone in a few decades, the policy will dissolve along with them, short of a newfound radical workers movement throughout the EU.
Come again? What is this supposed to mean?
Guess who's to thank for that German policy...it begins with an 'M' and ends with 'ists.'
Also, Levittown construction and materials are not comparable in any meaningful way to McMansions.
You mean the economic principle of supply and demand?
The McMansions will be unlivable by that point. They weren't built to last.
If you did go to college, your poverty is your classmates' fault because there were too many of them.
It's funny how the system is never to blame.