https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amazon_Web_Services#List_of_pr...
Putting that aside, I'm not sure "why aren't people complaining?" is a reasonable way to prove or disprove how buggy software is.
282 karma · joined September 17, 2013
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amazon_Web_Services#List_of_pr...
Putting that aside, I'm not sure "why aren't people complaining?" is a reasonable way to prove or disprove how buggy software is.
Amazon is far too large to give Jeff credit for 100% of the output, despite his name being on the door or ultimate decision making authority belonging to him.
https://www.reddit.com/r/announcements/comments/3cbo4m/we_ap...
Not a fun job, but definitely a fantastic step forward.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/04/technology/reddit-moderato... http://www.npr.org/sections/alltechconsidered/2015/07/05/420...
How would you interview software engineering candidates?
> As an engineer, your manager WILL BE a former SDE. If you are a manager, however, then maybe your manager may not have been an engineer.
Totally untrue. I spent many years at Amazon, with most of my managers being managers by trade and half of them being openly non-technical.
>> All advancement is political and because of stack ranking its really easy to stab people in the back
> The type of "stack ranking" people refer to as being evil is not the same that's practiced at Amazon (it's barely stack ranking at all). And you saying that advancement is political, just shows that you're disgruntled with the company, this is just not true (for engineers at least).
If you are not a manager, you do not have direct visibility into this process and cannot make this claim. If you are a manager, then you're aware that every department is run very differently and should also be aware that some of them are very political.
I'm curious on what you think separates Amazon's interpretation of stack ranking from the "bad" versions, or how it is "barely" stack ranking at all.
That doesn't mean that you or your manager are necessarily doing a great job though, or that other people aren't being hurt by the system.
I'm not against a third party managing my data synchronization, but it was pretty clear our priorities did not align.
This title as posted on HN (not in the article) is silly, though. The Linux kernel does not have "interns", this person is an intern for GNOME's OPW (Outreach Program for Women):
Also, how'd you find that link? If you happened to just have it laying around, that's fine but it would be better if they had these things linked somewhere customers can find them when new ones are posted (like a page covering service post-mortems) and the timeline is missing little details like the year when the outage happened and a point of contact (it's signed by "the aws team") if you have questions.
So does SFO. Don't all airports in the US use TSA?
Also, literally every other city you mentioned has Uber available. Speaking specifically to Seattle, we also have Lyft and the other "popular" transportation-as-an-app services available.
This does not immediately look authentic. Why would a letter like this be "signed" by the CEO instead of a member of Amazon's legal department?