1,814 karma · joined October 26, 2018
transitive verb
1: to call forth or draw out (something, such as information or a response) her remarks elicited cheers
2: to draw forth or bring out (something latent or potential) hypnotism elicited his hidden fears
Maybe so, but I don't want you in charge of determining my feelings on the matter, and I want to be subject to your censorious ideas even less. We may agree on many things, but inevitably we'll disagree on others and then my life becomes worse because of your judgement. Just leaving it alone is probably the least harmful thing.
> Same thing with murder videos
Philosophically, can a dead person be re-victimized?
Backup your phone to cloud storage prior to travel, wipe it, hand border agents a nearly empty phone, restore once across the border.
Also to address other posts in the thread, while I don't think this specific example is worth indicting JS developers over, I do think the culture of infinite dependencies common to JS developers is. This shouldn't be an entire additional dependency. Just implement the modulo operation, or as parent suggests, make a nicely named utility function that wraps the modulo operation. But when the culture strongly encourages downloading micro packages for every little thing, I can hardly blame them for adding this into the pile of yet more things they've downloaded.
The simpler programming can be made to be, the better. I'm not going to die on the anti-modulo hill, I don't care that much about it. But I think it's silly to pretend that it's not overly complicated (even if only a little) for the task most commonly at hand.
All of this is to say, instead of this being an indictment of the JS ecosystem and its programmers, its more indicative of a stdlib function that should exist but doesn't.
I’m not very sympathetic to their situation, but I am concerned with the effects of their growing resentment of their neighboring, less decayed states.
I'm broadly unfamiliar with Microsoft's promotion culture, but this strikes me as incredible. But in the "something seems incorrect" sense of the word. Were you hired at an incorrectly low level, were you a one-in-a-million talent, or is there huge title inflation at Microsoft now?
Now that is interesting. I've been on the FireFox train for 20 years but I haven't seen a "best viewed in FireFox" tag in a long time. It's a pleasant surprise, but I'm also curious how Chrome has managed to be bad at this.
I'm just as anti-bloat as the next HN'er, but optimizing websites is almost certainly not a business interest, therefore not an imperative, and therefore not going to happen. Instead of just wishing web developers were better, it would be more productive to find a way to align website optimization with business interests.
After all, how many people, really, would stop using websites or apps because they're slow? They can be frustrating, but most of the non-tech people I know just deal with it. That's hardly a recipe for changing the way websites are built. Basically, I posit to you that website, webapp, and mobile app optimization is a revealed preference [0], where the preference is that it's not actually important.
Obviously the number of people working on the super secret stuff is smaller, not to mentioned each project has a compartmentalized staff, but keeping secrets at this size is going to be a tough ask. They seem to do a pretty good job, but we know they’re not infallible at it. I imagine RenTech at 1/100th the size would have a vastly easier time.