933 karma · joined April 12, 2016
https://cpj.org/data/imprisoned/2020/?status=Imprisoned&star...
We are a mid-size AI/ML consultancy company. We have not yet have a project where we'd actually been given enough data and resources from a customer to be even able to learn a NN from scratch. Vast majority of the problems we tackle are easily solvable with traditional ML methods which these fresh candidates consider obsolete and boring.
This tutorial pretends to be mildly aware of that, yet the first course it offers is Andrew Ng's ML, which is structured in a way that it culminates in building a NN, a brief mention of RF and then it jumps straight into DNN.
A disclaimer that this is hardly a thing a person would actually do for living should be included at the beginning of every tutorial such as this one.
- Some of the windows look like they look now (Safari, Maps, ...) [1]
- Settings are skinnier [2]
- Finder is bulkier [2]
I might be a bit autistic in this hurts my eyes.
[1] https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2020/06/apple-introduces-maco...
[2] https://developer.apple.com/design/human-interface-guideline...
> Virtualization technology allows users to run Linux.
How does it relate to the switch to ARM?
Did they get finally worried about success of WSL on Windows and aim to compete in that area?
[1] https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2020/06/apple-announces-mac-t...
After checking out the slides I kind of feel that there might be some oversimplification in the used simulator, like producing _the desired lean angle_ might not be enough. But I am no expert.