1,390 karma · joined March 19, 2012
However, it's a RECTANGLE, that's huge. that means we can use it on screens and that non-map geeks would be OK with it.
"So enough already. Grow up now, study history..."
Regardless of the actual content of the article, I found the style of so many unnecessary ad hominim attacks offputing.
The actual content of the article isn't really backed up. It mostly seems to say that engineers are seduced by the elegance of Basic Income and that they should really just focus on making the existing social system have less friction. Not a bad opinion, just not really in line with the many statements that "Basic Income won't work".
That obviously won't net RC any money.
Try actually counting your calories over the course of a week.
[1] http://articles.mcall.com/1985-07-19/news/2489404_1_steel-in...
This is actually an article that can be summed up as "LD50 results for venom are irrelevant, some animals (e.g. hedgehogs) have resistance to venom that could kill [insert large number] mice. That's why the venom is so potent"
Now, I don't like those beliefs at all. I do think that LC made the right decision though. Inclusiveness is a good policy, and no matter how certain more authoritarianly inclined progressives are spinning this, that's what this is. Assuming no one is threatened, and he isn't promoting his politics, he should have a chance of going through the (anonymized!) entry process and talking about the really weird and awesome Urbit.
[1] http://unqualified-reservations.blogspot.fr/2009/07/why-carl...
edit: One of my main philosophical issues with Moldbug (besides the repugnancy), is that he is internally inconsistent. He might refute that later on. I dunno, he's spewed out literally tens of thousands of pages of text.
Cannabis doesn't produce nectar, so bees won't be attracted to it. They might be interested in resin, so as to make propolis... but I doubt any cannaboids would turn up in the honey.
Disclaimer: I don't keep bees, but I've been looking into it. Someone with more experience might know more, listen to them. It'd be cool if this worked.
I wish him the best of luck. rr is really awesome and deserves even more attention.
Lisp, especially in it's early implementations is highly imperative. This is why when people talk about Clojure they always talk about Immutability, it's part of what forces a functional style on the language.
sure, you might be able to do more transactions with an increased block size, but I personally feel the negatives are not worth it. Regardless, having the ability to do things off the main bitcoin chain is a good thing.
Even more so "cripple Bitcoin" it the wrong way of phrasing something that
a) currently how things are
b) intensely disputed in the community
They are working with the reality of bitcoin, trying to make it more. Nothing prevents other people from also being able to extend bitcoin. Even if blockstream became dominant in this respect, the system is 100% trustless.
Bitcoin is only one piece of the necessary crypto-currency infrastructure. 2-way pegging is a _good_ way of extending it.
It really sparked my interest in CS. I'm not saying it's the best thing out there, but there certainly is no bullshit GUI...
Uh.. I actually often do. I would more, but it generally isn't appreciated and is off topic of the main thread. Here, the software license is a key component of the release seeing as it is a unique component of it.
>Open source is about the source being open plus certain benefits.
It's more than that. The key intent of OSS is the right to study, change, and distribute the software to anyone and for any purpose. The source code is just a prereq for that ability.
I did initially use stallman-esque language, since it's terminology most people are familiar with in this field, but I'll approach it from a different point since I personally have problems with strong copy-left licenses.
The primary thing this license doesn't do is allow distribution in the OSS spirit. This is really just a pervasive license, actually in some ways similar to the Stallman-esque virality except with a corporate intent. It simply masquerades as OSS.
It's made by them as well. It most certainly is not libre/free software. I'm guessing it has minimal legal ability to stand up in court. It is a bastardization of what open source is about... really it's more of a disclosed source setup.