vips7L

I’d have to stop interacting with meat proxies and wouldn’t have to read copy pasted LLM text.

Big fan of Keycloak personally, but I'm also deep in the Quarkus/JVM ecosystem and Quarkus makes deving against Keycloak extremely easy.

> just hook into the Auth library you use (library, not service).

I think this is a fundamental misunderstanding of how this stuff works. You can't "just use a library". Your identity server is a service, open source or not and you have to align to how they do things.

I really whole heartedly disagree and if you think it’s silly I think that you don’t really fully understand the complexity of it. An LLM doesn’t solve everything. You still need to understand the spec, become a domain expert, and design your solution for the parts that the RFCs leave open with undefined behaviour. At the very least if this is your opinion you should start with an open source solution like Keycloak or authentic and fork it if you really need “control”.

This is a terrible suggestion. Rolling your own auth nowadays is like rolling your own encryption. It’s just a bad idea. OAuth and OIDC are massive specs that are constantly changing and you’re going to be stuck chasing and developing auth instead of your actual product.

I know because this is what my brain dead principal engineer did and I’ve spent the last 3 years chasing RFCs and am now going to spend the next year migrating to Keycloak because I’ve finally convinced my boss that we’re not an auth company.

“Usefulness”

Generated Sloppies bro

Does it? The only think I can think of not being in the standard library is a json parser

Can’t get left behind by people who can’t write a crud endpoint or an email by themselves.

Yes they will.

Isn’t that because select wasn’t style-able?

I think Source Hut has 0 ai features. Or time to start self hosting.

Slop

How do you know? Why are we inclined to believe you over him?

The creator of flutter was on here saying that 1/3 of all apps on the App Store use it. That seems to be a lot more than “nobody”.

I’ve worked at plenty of startups. It still does not matter, it never has.

I genuinely doubt it. Amdahl’s law will always reign supreme.

Same man. I hate everything about this career path right now, but even real (civil, structural) engineers get paid massively less. I think I’ve just come to a realization that software engineering salaries are just massively inflated, especially for those of us that just do the programming part and not the actual engineering part.

It just seems like there’s a reckoning coming for our field. I’m going to keep doing it, I don’t see any other choice right now.

Speed doesn’t matter.

ANY push back is bots? Yeah this is boot-licker bullshit.

> Wonder how quick this will get removed off the front page

YC’s an investor after all

People are lazy.

If LLMs are any good, like many of you claim, they won’t need these comments. They will ingest the code and know what was done. They won’t need comments about what wasn’t done.

You know there’s no quantitative data. It’s vibes from the top down.

Sad little world we live in tbh.

You might not see this since I'm rather late. What is a value type exception? Is it one that doesn't collect a stack trace? Or doesn't unwind in the usual way or something?

Java's problem with checked exceptions is that they didn't add them fully to the type system (the lambda problem), and they never added any syntax sugar to make them easier to deal with. I really love checked exceptions and wish we could get some improvements.

Except TS has much wider community support. The type definitions/wrappers are already written.

It seems like Java is thinking about it now that Valhalla is landing and they’re expecting more user defined mathematical types.

> my criticism was that Java requires an overengineered GC to compensate for its fundamental language flaws that make optimization all but impossible.

Except this criticism will be outdated. (but then you moved the goal post to syntax).

> Go's GC is nowhere near as complex, and yet it performs much better

Benchmarks prove otherwise.