valleyer

That's what zsh's INC_APPEND_HISTORY (mentioned in TFA) avoids. Bash may have an equivalent.

If the author is here, do yourself a favor and rewrite the app's labels from Claudese to English.

"what the shape does not decide: Pitch is size and tension; fade is material and air. Neither is in the outline, so both are yours."

English, motherfucker. Does Claude speak it?

Incidentally, according to https://gpt-tokenizer.dev, in gpt-5, "literature" is two tokens ("liter" + "ature"), whereas "文学" is one.

Yeah, "X, and it's Y" is a common trope I see.

Yeah, I've noticed it recently, too. I'd be interested to know where it started.

Parent is maintainer of rsync.net, in case that wasn't obvious. (There's no contact information in your profile.)

Yes. The people that make up that corporation should care about their fellow man (family, friends) and should take pride in making good things (personal fulfillment).

We are allowed to pierce the corporate veil here.

They're just being intentionally obtuse.

In a composited window system (i.e., any Mac since Mac OS X and Windows since Vista [I think]), rendering from an SVG would have to occur in a window buffer owned by the application, so it wouldn't save any appreciable amount of memory, assuming the buffer is the size of the window. The days of having an application draw directly into the framebuffer are well in the past.

Seriously. We already lost "crypto" to such carelessness.

The Times article lists several.

No, you can also take your clothes off and throw them upward with sufficient force.

The son of the elderly Iranian ruler, aligned politically with his father, took over. The war prompted Iran to operate one of the world's largest economic pressure levers, to great effect. The U.S.'s unilateralism, leadership rhetoric, and war crimes (like bombing a school) have lost it a significant amount of global goodwill.

None of that seems like it jibes with your description.

Is "cowork" a general industry term now? Here I was just getting used to "coding" replacing "programming".

The exception that proves the rule.

It seems so. But why here? The president has the power to ban imports for security reasons; unlike many of his tariffs, a narrow ban like that would likely hold up in court, as long as it were accompanied by some made-up justification.

Maybe Jobs was encouraging Atkinson to proverbially skate to where the puck will be -- to create something that will be good now but great in the future.

Even if you think banning Chinese-made vacuum robots is reasonable, it seems bizarre to do so by withholding FCC approval. The fear isn't that they'd spam our RF spectrum... is it?

The article mentions that, in Georgia, funding for these came from the state budget and even quotes a state legislator on the committee on the education appropriations committee.

It also mentions that the effort is "spearheaded" (whatever that means) by the state legislature in Florida.

It's not CS 101 that JavaScript apparently sucks at TCO. That was surprising to me.

Your use of the term "gain-of-function" here reveals your base level of conspiracy-theory-mindedness.

Ah yes, the Feynman Algorithm for shell scripting.

That doesn't mean you can't set up DNS names to point at them.

Not if the harness applies an OS-level sandbox to the process, as Codex does.

https://learn.chatgpt.com/docs/sandboxing?surface=cli

No, merely analyzing or discussing the law generally does not constitute the practice of law. If it did, plenty of newspaper articles, law review journals (often written by law students), non-attorney legal aid, and legal pamphlets would be prohibited.

If you want something more concrete, I googled it, and in New York, there appears to have been a case New York County Lawyers’ Association v. Dacey, in which Dacey wrote a book "How to Avoid Probate!", and the NYCA accepted a dissent in a lower court, stating in part:

    Does the writing, publication, advertising, sale and distribution of "How To Avoid Probate!" constitute the unauthorized practice of law within the meaning of subdivision B of section 750? It cannot be claimed that the publication of a legal text which purports to say what the law is amounts to legal practice. And the mere fact that the principles or rules stated in the text may be accepted by a particular reader as a solution to his problem does not affect this.

and later humorously quoting:

    "[I]t is a prized American privilege to speak one's mind, although not always with perfect good taste, on all public institutions" (Bridges v. California, 314 U. S. 252, 270)

https://accessiblelaw.org/Disclaimer.html

The law applies to everyone, so it's reasonable for everyone to try to understand it, not just attorneys.

Similarly, it's fine for people to have opinions on food, dental hygiene, and the tax code without being a chef, a dentist, and an accountant.

> By contrast, you can, right now, try believing that what’s happening is what’s supposed to be happening, in exactly the right order.

My government is currently killing people for looking Mexican. Any advice for how I should apply this belief there?

This lawsuit alleges violation of federal, not state, law.

Arabic or Hebrew would be better tests for that.