unified101

EA.

In all fairness this is someone saying something. Misremembering happens. Unless we have something with a bit more evidence, the simpler explanation suffices.

> the secret

So such thing existed. In fact, what they learnt was some progress existed, not what the specific progress was.

Tldr.

For all your bombast, do take a moment to note that no mathematician has actually said openai has not produced a correct solution. Should make you think.

Which bridge? Do share the contract.

Put down the pitchfork. It's a toggle in their settings.

> Code that serves a business function might as well be slop. Math that serves directly a business function also can be slop.

Both of these are simply incorrect - serving a business function means it's valuable to that function.

Have we asked it new interesting math problems, after studing some space for an evening or a day?

What do u think lean is? That's like saying a program that works, is inscrutable because it appeals to the oracle of "code test cases" to prove itself correct.

You're either being intentionally obtuse, or unintentionally ignorant.

Isn't that a selfish viewpoint? You're ok with that?

Didn't realise thinking was being banned.

Lets say I like AI it makes my life easy and I don't mind datacenters.

You seem to have a problem with capitalism. Not AI or datacenters. Capitalism isnt working right now. Ask for that to be abolished. Don't point your finger at a genuinely useful and accessible technology.

Open source is solved. Human PRs are gunking up the process

PRs submission should be closed, and only issue submission, with a prompt to reccreate and fix the issue should be shared. This way the prompts users are using to do things - the real contribution - will make their way to maintainers who can then choose to convert it into a PR and merge.

source?

post WW2 basically.

The worry as the OP has pointed out - they will be asked to leave the workforce if they want to hone their craft by handcoding.

"Celebrity" is an old world concept, and does not need to exist. it's find if we don't have them

I'm opposing viewpoints that say might makes right.

Closed source - for those who maybe miss this. litestream with sqlite vector based design would be more apt for someone.

Ethical behavior only when you have leverage is for a hollow personality.

We need to give juniors a way in, and in the AI world honestly the only way i can think of is to maek CS a minimum wage job at the 0 yoe level. Let it ramp to full pay in 6 years.

This way students will make the choice for the longer term, and opportunies will be easy to find for them.

Being an employee is an exercize in force of all kinds (do the work, join the call, do this do that) . By it's very nature, in-office workspace is what people want, not butt in office. Somehow people believe the same force for work location is suddenly too much?

RTO is an expression of that. Best workers can do is vote with their employment.

> But seeing people get away with such levels of incompetence

This is the deeper narrative. Some things apart from anger you could do: 1. Inspect this narrative and see if it's right? Or is there something you don't understand. It's happened for some reason. Disallow easy answers. 2. Learn that, so you're better prepared for the future.

You can choose to be unsure.

Why not? What kind of work is this for?

How long since you had to really manually edit. That world is history now - no point holding on to it.

Does this offer anything over fedora silver blue

> The cost of engineering and implementation has always been low

With Opus and fable and sol at dozens of dollars for a month, i don't know how you can straight-faced say that. But you do you.

The world is changed - given the low cost of reverse engineering and implementation, it would be product suicide to openly call out a money making product.

I don't expect too many actual >500$ moneymaking projects to be listed. Would love to be proven wrong.

It surely can. It's what I would assume by default.