ujkiolp

I will defer to your judgment on this as I am not passionate either way and I trust your expertise.

generalizations, generalizations

call it whatever, it distracts discussions away from the subject to the way it’s being said

>It did take maybe a year or so

we have normalized this for git - a tool to store versions of text. That’s the problem

not my experience - almost always some edge case leads me to a git rabbit hole

tldr: even if you never plan to use anything advanced, you’ll end up in some weird situation where you need to do something even if you’re in the “95% of the users”

no shade, yes ofc you “could this, could that” to make things work and we have been stuck with this for so long that an alternative doesn’t even seem plausible

unless you work for hospitals or critical infrastructure, this reaction is overblown and comical

Bad solution simply because of information loss!

* after STT, there is objectively less info in the storage format

* OP cannot take advantage of rapidly advancing OCR tech on the storage

* inevitably OP might end up saving the originals “just in case”- rendering this entire process useless