typs

Yes, though the article is about this. Forgivable given the paywall though.

TLDR is women are more employed because healthcare continues to see growth in jobs and employment women; also, the software engineering job apocalypse is probably structural not AI, and already bouncing back.

This is so sick. I agree that it’s a little lame that we have all these AI capabilities right now, robotics improving, and all we can think of making is humanoid robots. Like I want a spider/squid hybrid robot running around my house

> “We have built in roles that auditors can use and have used extensively in the past but would not give the ability to make changes or access subsystems without approval,” he continued. “The suggestion that they use these accounts was not open to discussion.”

From the previous post, they had auditor roles built in that they purposely chose to go around

I’m not sure I fully understand the rationale of having newer mini versions (eg o3-mini, o4-mini) when previous thinking models (eg o1) and smart non-thinking models (eg gpt-4.1) exist. Does anyone here use these for anything?

If fixing trade was the goal of these tariffs, Trump had other, better options. He did not listen to policy advisors who have spent a long time writing about how to prepare the US for a war with China and rebalancing global trade. This is why it’s been a PR disaster, not because it was preemptive decisive action.

API usage has also doubled in the last 6 months(!!)

The “as” does a lot of work in the headline: hints causation but doesn’t say it (because it can’t!)

Notably for serving Chinese devices (not in the US). It looks like they’re going with Alibaba instead.

Interesting article. I think the author though is describing pretty normal market dynamics and seems to be responding to advice from people with more enterprise-y backgrounds. Most B2B SaaS markets have the enterprise players (who nail sales and service) and the SMB players (who nail product led growth and inbound from developers).

Depending on the market and product, players from either side may win the whole thing or it can stay fragmented. Often, eventually, the enterprise players do try and move down-market by building the muscle for product-led growth and hiring developer advocates while the SMB players try and move up market by hiring sales and building out the product to be more enterprise friendly.

In my own industry, it seems like enterprise companies moving down market are having more success, but I can imagine in other markets the opposite is true. In some areas the customer is so valuable that products can keep being built for them, but that’s an open question (that the author seems to be betting on, for now).

And people can watch short form content on their TV, so that counts in this too

Mm you’d be surprised at how many college students are sitting in front of a big TV vegging on youtube shorts

+1 on using Cursor rules. In general I feel that Cursor definitely has a fairly steep learning but is a great product if you can move up it.

Well the nonprofit theoretically controls the for-profit, so the argument would be that the subsidiary for profit is somehow worth more than its parent? It’s a complicated legal structure but I don’t think that could be true.

This is the modern version of 2010's "Amazon makes no money in retail"

They seem to be doing ok...

https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=now%201-d&geo=...

Yes but why would investors on the board who own a piece of OpenAI at 157B be ok with a sale at a smaller valuation?

This. Most users don't care about what model has the best benchmarks on twitter.

ChatGPT is an extremely successful consumer product. Looking at Search traffic alone indicates they clearly have large brand value. Usage doesn't just depend on just benchmarks for most consumers.

Notably a steep discount from their recent raise at a 157B. The board would never approve.

True, though the lack of Stack Overflow / internet use during interviews has always been a critique as they've never seemed fully tied to the experience of the job.

Yeah, I think interviews are to get some signal of competence and ability to prepare / offer some filtering ability even if they're a bit arbitrary or banal.