tubs

Aye, but the L-system still fits given the amount of data shown in the question. So is the L-system incorrect, because there's no way to disambiguate the sequence given the data?

It looked like it was a simple L-system to me...

V : 1 2

ω : 1

P : (11 -> 21) (2 -> 12) (1 -> 11)

I think that matches the information given in the question. Would that be an "incorrect answer"?

All the important "bits" of NetHack are handcrafted though, much in the same way d3 is.

If you are deleting a word in order to correct a mistake (ie/ by typing it back in) it's usually best to `cw` or `cb`, which will leave you in insert mode after the delete.

I think it was in reference to other titles submitted lately in general, not necessarily by you.

How about keeping a (per-user) .vimrc.bits file on the site itself, then a button per bit would add/remove that snippet from my .vimrc.bits, which I can include in my main .vimrc.

This could get better integration with the site, given it would be reasonably simple to remove snippets as well as add them.