3,017 karma · joined July 25, 2013
This kind of baby and bathwater argument could as well be used to ban writing altogether!
Hmm.
Being "the oldest and largest specialist anarchist bookshop in Britain" without succumbing to internecine bickering and factionalisation is pretty darn radical, I would have thought.
The reification of counterfactual outputs which are otherwise indistinguishable from the remainder of LLM production etiologically is a better candidate for the label "hallucination" IMO.
Or maybe there's an opportunity for someone to create an "interop environment" where AIs representing diverse persons' agendas within an organisation can come together and agree on outcomes and goals on behalf of their sponsors (maybe not completely serious, but ...)
Yeah, I know TFA is just notetaking but that shouldn't stop us from thinking ahead, right? The possibilities for cost-cutting in middle management are spectacular!
0: https://americanfaith.com/bill-gates-funded-research-into-ge...
youtube.com (133)
foxnews.com (72)
thepostmillennial.com (67)
foxbusiness.com (66)
breitbart.com (64)
x.com (63)
reuters.com (51)
truthsocial.com (48)
nypost.com (47)
dailywire.com (36)
jfc.Maybe one way to think of this is the chatbot and a susceptible user stochastically spiralling each other into a folie à deux[0] together?
We're supposed to think "oh it's an LLM, well, that's ok then"? A question we'll be asking more frequently as time goes on, I suspect.
For example, I think this has the best exposition of OpenAI corporate history and Altman's part in it that I've encountered.
The interviewer, while annoyingly keen to inject his own political slant, at least asks some decent questions and knows how to sit quiet listening to the answers.
0: https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/743569/empire-of-ai...
The channel is a Leftist UK media outlet with a capital L and the interviewer a self-professed Marxist, but if you can ignore or fight your way through the left spin there's plenty of informative and well presented narrative details about the history of OpenAI, its ambitions and methods and those of its CEO.
0: https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/743569/empire-of-ai...
Title would possibly be better as Aaron Bastani Meets Karen Hao, but there you are.
Whenever I encounter one in my recommends I use the "do not recommend from this channel" option, but I'm clearly fighting a losing battle.
Just one of the many reasons I think AI generated content should be required by law to be marked as such, and passing it off as human produced should be proscribed. When we drown in a sea of slop at least it will be clearly labeled.
(ETA:) My banks probably have apps, but I only use them via their websites, even on my phone (in a desperate pinch).
However, it seems Arch are also dropping multilibs as a dependency of Wine, and moving to WoW64[1], with "reduced performance for 32-bit applications that use OpenGL directly".
What this implies for Steam on Arch (and hence for Conty) I'm not sure, though as of May some Proton versions have a PROTON_USE_WOW64 env var according to [2], so maybe multilibs can already be avoided running Steam natively anyhow.
0: https://github.com/Kron4ek/Conty
1: https://archlinux.org/news/transition-to-the-new-wow64-wine-...
2: https://github.com/ValveSoftware/Proton/issues/6889 (comment from artemyto on May 3)
Well, if this is meant to counter the abstract's claim that:
> Modern smartphones are designed to manipulate the attention and behaviour of users in ways that further the interests of the corporations that built them. In this they are importantly different from resources typically associated with the extended mind—such as notebooks, Scrabble racks and maps—which are not designed to manipulate or exploit users
I think it falls a little short of refuting a claim that in this particular case things are going somewhat wrong.
I do use containerised solutions for a few things (e.g. conty[0] for Steam, and a couple of rocm containers for messing with ML things).
KDE is the default desktop and does everything I need. I haven't used gnome for a decade anyhow.
https://www.port.ac.uk/news-events-and-blogs/news/new-theory...
Arxiv version of the paper:
> These statements betray a conceptual error: Large language models do not, cannot, and will not “understand” anything at all.
While I find lots to agree with in TFA, this pedantry over "understanding" irritates.
While the "understanding" of LLMs is (I believe) a very different affair from human understanding, I wonder if the author can find a better word to succinctly convey what Hassabis is saying?
The problem here is not word choice but failure to recognise that the meaning of a word has changed when the context of its use changes. If I say "it thinks the db is down because it doesn't know the cache is out of date", no-one (or at least very very few!) would take issue with "thinks" and "knows" on the basis that a simple computer program doesn't have human-level knowledge and thought. The words serve to convey meaning, and the context is clear.
If the author doesn't recognise this typical feature of language, extending the meaning of existing words when they are used in new contexts, the "conceptual error" is on them.
> Elon Musk said on Thursday that his rocket company SpaceX will not decommission its Dragon spacecraft just hours after stating that the company would begin decommissioning
- https://www.reuters.com/science/spacex-will-not-decommission...
"Trump/Musk/J.Random.Blowhard says XYZ" stories are highly ignorable IMO. Reporters should concentrate on what they actually do.
If only!
Yes, it's just a way of going directly to google's "web" search instead of "all" so you don't get the AI summary and half a screen of assorted guff before the search results themselves. In that sense it's 100% effective.
No. Starting 2-3 years you had to go through about:config to do this, such as detailed at
https://www.reddit.com/r/FirefoxCSS/comments/qqkw5x/enabling...
and
https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/custom-search-eng...
etc.
Heaven knows what they were thinking when they made this option only available by the user adding an undocumented preference!
I needed to do this on desktop linux a few months ago to use the AI-avoiding &udm=14 google tweak[0]