I’ve never heard of rodents being associated with marijuana destruction. Is marijuana one of those odd crops that attracts a different category of pests? Like flower bulbs and deer?
395 karma · joined May 14, 2014
I’ve never heard of rodents being associated with marijuana destruction. Is marijuana one of those odd crops that attracts a different category of pests? Like flower bulbs and deer?
Surprising as it is that a blood test for drug use gleaned from one's bio-waste is slightly rotten, maybe it's the vice laws that should be thrown some shade. Fourth amendment, sure, but I think it's worth noting that it's still the burden of the individual to render their discarded waste non-incriminating.
What this means for genetic privacy, finger prints and other powerful personal identifiers (the what-you-are authentication factors), I simply don't have a good answer for.
It also completely eradicates your data allocation on a capped/throttled mobile connection, since high quality video is capable of sucking down 25GB in as little as 2 hours. The worst case scenario being that 25GB is the standard capacity of an HD blu-ray disk. Maybe at lower NTSC quality, some video ads only eat up the amount a DVD consumes, clocking in at ~2GB per one hour.
Put another way, if you completely buffer the same 30 second full motion video ad, 240 times, that advertisement has completely abused the data cap for your mobile plan.
The only other thing I can think of is the long con of snooping on periphery data to guess at a second factor security questionaire interview...
1. What’s your first pet’s name?
2. What street did you grow up on?
3. What was your grandmother’s maiden name?
Are there any other weird invasive problems a product like this could evoke?Consider the idea of paying for cable, and still watching commercials. It’s sort of like paying for the internet connection and still paying for the content. No thanks.
The internet is frequently better than TV, because merit is free to boil to the surface without being stifled. It’s not that the internet is free of bland tripe. But merely that it’s costly to force bland tripe to the front, and when the state-sponsored tripe gets upstaged by something better, it’s harder to bury the higher quality content.
The problem with the internet is the firehose of The Long Tail ultimately does bury absolutlely everything (good and bad), so once again, over time everything is obscured by default, leading to micro-generation gaps (maybe spanning as little as two years) and reasonably large subcultures that never see the light of day.
On some level though, the movie industry has proven that profits don’t matter, since we see that for the last decade, profitable movies are mostly unwatchable garbage.
So, even if TV manages to be profitable, it can surely deserve the same sideshow status as movies. The only thing the internet paradoxically lacks right now (despite massive unicorn companies with nigh unlimited resources) is the unrestrained budget movies enjoy. And this is because the most captivating things on the internet are authentic in real time, and cannot be “budgeted” in a traditional sense.
To be fair, you look at those CPU utilization graphs, and the optimization bonus for this sacrifice of security is notable. The benefits are real, for these computation strategies. The reality is that yet again, we must sacrifice convenience in the name of security. This is why we can’t have nice things.
Ultimately, though, your pining for dignified silence and stoicism as the one true lowest common denominator is to be unrequited. Civilization among the civilized is not always a good thing. We all know that somewhere deep within the unknown recesses of some massive social planning department, circuits are being designed to lock us in, and make us pay for stepping out of line. Keep that fact in the front of your mind. Not as a goof. Not as a pacifier or placebo.
It’s all bullshit. It’s a valid gripe. It bears repeating.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_orbital
Is that about right?
Any company or project providing a patch, has a way of testing the validity of the patch. Those test kits can be weaponized, but not without a degree of skill. Anyone who tests software knows this.
The hole is there, and publicly known as of today, but nothing a high school script kiddie can trivially leverage for good grades. Yet.
No one is giving out payloads and telling people they can try this at home, and watch it go. Nothing is known to be in a pastebin or git repo at the moment. This doesn’t mean the black market isn’t crafting kits for sale at a high price right now for big game hunting though.
Propagating the salient point of the article allows the useful information to be communicated, without loading needless megabytes of adtech UI in your browser.
You should still read the article, and not blindly trust internet randos, but as participant in an aggregator, this kind of behavior is sometimes helpful, as long as things don’t get spammy.
Yes perfect
EDIT: People are vehement about the status of this particular character, and that doesn’t change the fact that I expected an article about a unit of measurement.
(yes, I understand that disagreement is
afoot, but it has nothing to do with
what I originally came here for) some IT/automation company that would charge you
exorbitant rates just because this is industrial
automation
This is shenanigans. This is the kind of game Enron [0] played, gouging prices for irrational reasons, until eventually outside intervention dismantled their operation, to discover actual costs.You’re being selfishly stoic, and that’s somewhat repugnant, even for a solipsist.
If there are N number of confusing junctions, it would require the same number of markings as a unique mnemonic device to register the steps to escape the confusing area, and jog one's memory of how directions were negotiated the last time.
To distinguish between neurons and glia, Herculano-
Houzel injected the vials with a chemical dye that
would make all nuclei fluoresce blue under ultraviolet
light, and then with another dye to make the nuclei of
neurons glow red.
You mean that part? It’s about differentiating support infrastructure from the actual cellular operators responsible for cognitive brain function.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuroglia
VS.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuronhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drifting_(motorsport)
> CTRL+F
Japan was the birthplace of drifting.
(hey, hacker news, fuck your downvotes)Not green AND CROSSED OUT means the radio is actually turned off, and is supposedly neither listening nor broadcasting, if state of the settings applet is somehow more trustworthy than the state of the control center’s slide-out drawer widget.
Note that other non-apple handsets might just be doing whatever, unpredictably.
Normal people with no skin in the game, beyond what’s for lunch, don’t behave this way.
There’s a small-ish subculture of afficionados and foodies, but I’ve never met anyone that obsesses over dinner to that degree. Usually it’s a byproduct of a phase they breifly went through, when they were on a kick about something.
The rare exception being the occassional young romantic couple, obsessing over the courtship rituals of wooing their hot date. This is less about the food than the date, and again, it’s yet another small-ish subculture, since 90% of everyone is undateable. [0,1]
(A) (B)
1. elbow, ass;
2. ass, elbow;
3. ass, ass;
4. elbow, elbow;
5. ass, ass;
6. ass, elbow;
7. ass, elbow;But if one were trying to suggest that “it’s time to put mesh networks in play as this newer model, to assert greater control” then I’d like to see a technology that solves certain problems, instead of the same technology as ever, with all it’s existing, known problems, except now distributed and peer-oriented.
I want to see the real problems solved, before I give everything away to peers. Otherwise unsophisticated peers can cause problems for me, just like an ISP. The difference being, most peers will be unprepared to exploit each other for a short amount of time, but then, as utilization saturates, and expertise grows, we’re back to square one.