tristanperry

* Ireland voting (twice) on the Nice Treaty - 2001 then 2002

* Denmark voting (twice) Maastricht Treaty - first 1992 then 1993

* Ireland (again) this time on the Lisbon Treaty - 2008 then 2009

There was also a case where the Labour government (in the UK) promised a referendum on a couple of EU treaty changes, before changing their mind after other countries' referendums voted them down, and just ratified it in parliament instead: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_European_Consti...

He's being flippant. If the logo wasn't there, it would just be a case of measuring N cm to know where to drill.

Until then, though, just change the word in the tag (with hyphens for multiple words), e.g.:

https://taken.photos/tags/chess/ https://taken.photos/tags/tabletop-game/

I should add that, from what I've heard, same day discharges is much more common for the second (/third/etc) child compared to having a first.

Mothers are frequently discharged from hospital the same day, or the following day. My wife had some (relatively minor) complications and thus had a 2 day stay. This is longer than average. Even mothers who had C-sections (i.e. major abdominal surgery) seem to stay <= 3 days, unless there's bigger complications.

Once home, the mother's 'midwife' will make home visits 2-4 times in the first week before 'passing' the care onto a 'health visitor'. They will also visit at home (1-2 times a week) for the next few weeks, before this becomes an at-clinic care.

There's also 'infant feeding nurses' (i.e. breastfeeding support) as needed, although this one does vary per area.

So it's no-where near the Netherlands level of care (having someone do the chores those first few weeks would have been very useful!), but it is definitely not the case that "you're on your own" after leaving hospital after a multi-day stay.

The page loads 41 requests and 12.88 MB of data, with the page taking 2+ seconds to properly load the content (1.09s according to Chrome dev tools, but this is just the initial DOM load).

For a simple webpage with white background and dark text.

Or is it a "If a tree falls in a forest..." type situation in that an unknown website with great content will continue to be an unknown website?

Since Google can't truly understand content quality/semantics, a certain level of marketing does seem to be needed to bring traffic in.

A Kia e-Niro is £32,995 (including the recently cut Government subsidy) whilst a similar size+spec petrol car (The Kia Rio 3) is £17,285.

The Nissan Leaf is from £27,995 whilst the larger Qashqai is from £19,995.

I know that the up-front cost issue is similar in many countries, but that's where Government subsidies usually kick in. America has the $7,500 federal tax credit on EVs (to a point), plus state subsidies sometimes top it up to $10k. This compares to the UK which has recently cut the £4,500 subsidy down to £3,500 for EVs.

"The Web We Want... doesn't require you to accept a cookie notice, ignore an anti-ad-blocker warning and newsletter pop-up before circumventing a soft paywall in order to read a quick, shared article."

https://www.greencarfuture.com/electric/how-norway-so-many-e...

I know that clickbait sells and all, but even "Wrong song played for pianist..." would be better and mostly accurate.

I'm not sure why this is done - whether it is to make the video easier to follow for non-native speakers, or to give a more 'authoritative' feel (slower speech = more confidence etc?), but I find such videos unbearable to watch at x1 speed.

So for me it's not about rushing and not enjoying the experience. It's about listening to it at a speed which is bearable: and hence enjoyable.

It's concerning how big of a role air pollution seems to be playing, considering it doesn't seem to be a mainstream concern.

[0] - https://www.homesandproperty.co.uk/home-garden/interiors/des...

The priority in this case (for the subset the article is referring to, of course) is always expectations > practicalities like money.

"After all, you only get married once"...

The actual production of an EV _can_ result in more emissions (along the whole supply chain) than petrol cars, yes.

Although the vast majority of car manufacturers (and supply companies) are geared up for producing petrol cars and not EVs, so it's no real surprise that _right now_ electric cars aren't as efficient to build.

The more that electric cars are produced, and the more that Li-ion/solid-state batteries are developed, the better the picture will be at the building stage.

That sounds exactly like what Netflix promised originally: cheap subscriptions, growing revenue through reach not higher prices.

Y'know, like when they offered a $11.99/month subscription in 2017... which now costs $15.99/month - a 33% rise in 1.5 years, whilst reducing the amount of content available.

As a Brit, it used to be a simple flow: check Netflix, almost certainly on there, watch.

Now it's usually not on there, and checking JustWatch shows that it's unavailable in the UK (without paying to buy or 'lease' the content, usually for a similar price to the streaming service's monthly rate).

You can see why torrenting is on the rise again: a Netflix subscription just doesn't cut it anymore, and Hulu isn't available in the UK without a VPN.

I find it bad that they hyped it up for so long and then removed it from online sales a month later, but you can still order it over the phone or in-branch.

Plus despite some rumours of 2+ month delays, they are actively being produced and have already been delivered to some customers (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sQgjY2SRrck).

It'd only be nightmarish if the driver (and passengers) have no faith in autopilot.

.. in which case, I doubt the road-trip would be driven entirely on autopilot.

I'm a Brit and assumed this was just an early April Fools Day joke - especially as a few articles said it was due to be implemented on 1st April 2018, but was delayed until 1st April 2019.

What a bizarre policy.