Thanks for working on this!
231 karma · joined March 13, 2013
Thanks for working on this!
Do you remember any particular studies that show this? Would love to read more on this topic.
It could be a bigger story than it seems at the moment.
So it's very clear that eating mammals and birds is ethically not okay but apart from the environmental reasons, eating sea food is probably not as bad as eating mammals/birds.
I would like to know in what way you think they are a better model than animals.
Nothing in this video is surprising though. It has always been clear that the value system of people in Silicon Valley is completely different from Republican values. Their despise for Trump or his base is the most obvious connection anyone can make.
https://www.cbs58.com/news/bird-scooters-in-milwaukee-are-il...
So even if I smoked a single joint since I started smoking, I am put in the the same bucket as someone who smokes weed daily? That doesn't sound right. Am I missing something?
"Declaration of conflicting interests The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article."
Can someone please explain this? I have no idea what was said there.
Tabbing doesn't work so I have to click on every text box to type.
You need to increase the number of colleges on the first page itself.
Keep working on this(potential of being helpful to many) and add more criteria as you mentioned.
Dawkins model(not his actually but he presented to general public) was not competition-centric. Main idea was gene centric view of life. Competition, cooperation, symbiosis etc all were explained from the genes point of view. The thing to note is, even when we see apparent 'cooperation' between species, at the genes level there is a competition with other gene pools. So the non-competitive forces look so on the surface, but the only thing genes care about is moving on to the next generations and spreading as much copies as possible even if that happens with symbiosis.
Gould on the other hand, was not happy with this selfish view of life(everyone says he had Marxist ideologies which made him a bit bias). He thought of selection as happening at multiple levels, not just limited at genes but also species and individual. This was the main controversy between him and dawkins.
So, to reply to GPs query, yes that quote is sort of incorrect since everyone agreed that cooperation and symbiosis(Darwin too) are very much part of evolution.
The only reason a bacteria will be less prone to washing away is if its useful for our skin in some way and has a symbiotic relationship with it. In which case its highly unlikely if it will turn out to be harmful in the long run.
In any case, is there any evidence that we do have some skin microbiota that sticks even after good soap wash?