trasz4

No reason to let your child any media, unless you want them to be literate or sth.

And social media is less harmful than some traditional ones. It's just that you've been conditioned by the traditional ones to believe they are somehow normal.

Yup, it's been long known that some state actors, like Russia, do that, usually by amplifying alt-right content.

He can, he just doesn't want to. And if he did we'd probably have no insight into what even happened. The society doesn't even know kings' finances.

None of those were caused by market forces.

>If you think society can adapt and a reasonable reduction of CO2 over time is the best approach using market forces, then for example

Then for example you might be a flat earther too. We've been trying that for past two decades and it's an epic failure.

>it's also not going to completely doom the human race

Ok, how?

UK is not a constitutional monarchy. The king could have me executed. The only reason they don't is the lack of need vs the expected public backlash.

I'd argue a coronation is just another show. Royalty are a pest, they don't have any important social function; interfering with them should be fine.

Same with presidents and whatnot. They can do their jobs without all that theatre.

In UK the king has absolute power, its just that they don't exercise it because in a civilised country they would need to be guillotined afterwards.

How is an unelected king not a dictator?

They didn't take too much memory, they mostly were just a bad ideas. "Ring security" doesn't really do anything; long command names are unwieldy and counterproductive (see PowerShell) etc; memory-safe languages have always been there in UNIX.

And it's not like C can't be memory-safe, as shown by CHERI/Morello (shameless plug). It depends on hardware.

But of course you can; there's an entire industry behind climate denialism.

The culture war was always there, you just see it now because your media can no longer be censored by capital like they used to.

Except todays applications are way less reliable than what we used two decades ago. It's not that we don't _nee to fix them anymore, quite the opposite. Instead we just learned to ignore those screwups, manually refreshing a page when it fails.

It's not a hack because of the boilerplate - it's a hack because it's functionality implemented in a wrong place. I think the boilerplate made you believe it's not a hack by making it look professional(ish), ie someone spend time putting a lot of lipstick on that pig, man page and all.

How does it look robust? Because someone wrote a man page and there's lots of boilerplate in it?

Proper design reduces complexity. The above adds a lot of complexity, and thus it's a hack. Not the appearance.

>If I need to write a wrapper script

And there's your problem - you don't realize "writing a wrapper script" is actually simpler than messing with config files.

>hard to do without feedback, of which analytics is one kind

[citation needed]

Good; the more people know about "piracy", the better.

tl;dr Cloudflare and other Big Data companies want to continue parasitizing on telco companies

>It's quite wide spread. There were reports about Israel doing it, Russia doing it and now Vietnam.

And of course leaving out USA doesn't make you a shill, right?

>if you've completely ignored that they are no longer employed by the CIA

Once a nazi, always a nazi. Same with CIA.

Socket activated services first appeared in inetd(8) somewhere in the eighties and is as UNIX as it gets :)

>Well, yep. Reinventing the wheel each other time.

Erm, no - flock(1) is a UNIX tool, a component if you will. It's the exact opposite of reinventing the wheel.

Not understanding the operating system you're using is fine, but it's good to at least know what you don't know.

Yeah, but with systemd timers it's just another ad hoc hack.

Also the sad fact is that STEM folks tend to be poor at humanities, so they easily fall prey to right wing fringe theories, they can't detect bs.

tl;dr US government doesn't only protect their war criminals, but also other kinds of criminals. And US public either doesn't care, or can't do anything.

It's not the "medical establishment" that sanctioned it - American society did.

Online is just offline with the caching layer missing.