trashtoss

What? Are we on the labor theory of value now?

Look I will be honest if not polite.

The farmers I know are doing well for themselves. My sample may be biased because I only encounter ones with an interest in technology, but to a one they don't seem to be hurting objectively (feel like they are hurting? Probably a few).

But these are people making something people want, in an efficient way, and capturing a perfectly-reasonable proportion of the value they create.

That's farmers though.

Rural "workers" I feel sorry for but only so much. I don't know these people like I know the farmers I know--farmers I meet through work, these I know only as extended family, friends thereof, and people I meet in passing while traveling for work--but I have met enough and known enough to know what the deal often is.

The standard story for these dudes tends to be they grew up in town, didn't do that well in high school--and these guys are usually older so they missed the big student loan expansions that changed college from rich kids and smart kids only to something most people had a crack at--but at least back then you really could walk onto the proverbial factory floor (or learn a skilled trade, but those guys' lives have tended to follow a different arc and I skip them here) and wind up with a stable, good paying job.

So the standard story continues with them doing hard honest work and being paid well for awhile--long enough to have settled down and started a family--but of course we all know the story ends once the factory shut down fifteen or twenty years ago.

Since then it has been a long, punishing grind, the city they live in has started falling apart, the good kids leave the area and try to make it elsewhere, the young people who are left are a mix of bad kids (drugs, petty crime), the unambitious, and a handful of saints i both admire and pity (hanging around out of a sense of obligation for a sick relative or similar).

It's a sad story, but to treat them as having had no agency in all this time is profoundly insulting--insulting in a way far graver than any any snark I can make in passing--and I refuse to do so.

The local factory closing and thus derailing your world and the life plans you made in it: that's a tragedy for you and yours, and I am truly sympathetic for the difficulties so imposed.

Failing to better yourself beyond "some high school, worked hard and honest for awhile"? That's on you. Spending multiple decades in the same place, waiting for outside forces to benevolently restore the favorable circumstances of yesteryear? That's on you. Failing to go to where there are actual jobs suitable for the skills they have (often, again being honest, out of a fear of urban life that would be comical if the consequences weren't so unfortunate)? That's on you.

We aren't taking about children here; these are grown men, possessed of automobiles, clean criminal records, and an admirable willingness to do hard, unrewarding work...but they are often also grown men feeling entitled to have that work offered to them in the place and manner of their own choosing, on terms of their own choosing, in accordance with the world they grew up in...and affording them a social stature and respect concordant with their own pride and self image.

With deep sympathy: the ask is too high, the world has been telling them that for decades, and after awhile any sympathy I have for their plight becomes entangled with scorn for failing to take real responsibility for their own lives.

It's hard for me, personally: as a rather more devout person than many on this site I really and sincerely believe that every human being possesses an intrinsic dignity and that we are all truly and equally alike in god's eyes and to love everyone as my neighbor...but it's hard not to slip into scorn and derision for people whose pride had lead them to fail to act like responsible adults and transformed what should have been a mere difficult period into a lifetime of struggle, disappointment, and resentment...and I have to struggle at it to keep my own disappointment in them from becoming something worse.

Have these unfortunate souls considered moving to closer to where productive economic activity is happening, and performing labor in exchange for money, which may be exchanged for goods and services?

If the rewards of productivity increases accrue to capital, what is the incentive for labor to improve their productivity?

This whole series misses the trees for the forest.

Design for logos and branding doesn't happen in the platonic realm and isn't focus grouped against brand-unaware Martians; such designs are engineered to serve a real role in the real world, in the minds of real people.

When you propose a super simple abstract logo -- a dot, a circle, a slash -- it works or not depending on if the organization in question is already well known or not.

Thus, proposing such a logo to a client is a form of flattery -- you, yes you, are already so well known you, yes you, can get away with simply having a slash for your identifier! -- and that is all there is to it.

Like all things this can be cargo culted, and smaller clients often want to look bigger than they are, so sure a lot of un savvy operations wind up with fashionably vague and functionally inferior designs, but it's always been that way.

Lastly, it also matters that logos appear all over the place today -- print, web, tv, mobiles, tablets, etc -- and simpler, cleaner logos are easier to make work across all physical scales.

This isn't a problem vector assets solves, either; at smaller sizes you need to change proportions around and generally cheat the spacing -- in short, smaller physical representations look better if deformed into charicatures -- and it is hard to get external parties to respect your rules about which variant to use at which sizes.

Much easier to make something that looks reasonable at all sizes and scales and use it consistently.

College dropout has unrealistic ideas to improve education.

I kid but only a little.

If the man had directly funded a school and gotten unquestionably superior outcomes the conversation would be rather different.

Instead, all he has to show are policy successes, often at great expense, but for such an ostensibly data-driven program where are the successful educational outcomes?