I agree with that law. Owning the land does not give you the right to abuse it. The land is forever, you are temporary.
Note that there are exceptions for actual forestry use.
10,347 karma · joined September 6, 2019
I agree with that law. Owning the land does not give you the right to abuse it. The land is forever, you are temporary.
Note that there are exceptions for actual forestry use.
This is regardless of who owns the land in question.
Sigh.
https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/aws/new-aws-public-ipv4-address...
We are introducing a new charge for public IPv4 addresses. Effective February 1, 2024 there will be a charge of $0.005 per IP per hour for all public IPv4 addresses, whether attached to a service or not
> Problem with slow data rates is that they clog up the channels.
Yes, we must protect the tubes! :)
You see this being deployed to service every customer of the partnering mobile networks, wherever they may be.
I see this being deployed to service those customers who aren't covered by existing and much cheaper land-based LTE-coverage from the partnering mobile networks.
I could see it kinda working, at low frequencies. They are not that far away and there's not many things blocking the signal besides your roof.
And again, wouldn't this primarily be activated in very desolate areas?
That's a matter of pricing, isn't it?
Also, won't this primarily be used where very few people roam? Otherwise they could just use the regular land-based LTE infra.
Remember: SpaceX can't just magically offer cheaper mobile coverage globally; they don't own any rights to use 4G/5G frequency bands. These are typically very expensive.
It makes a lot of sense for SpaceX to partner with mobile operators who own these rights but don't utilize them very well in sparsely inhabited areas.
This is presumably about 4G/LTE, so mostly between 0.4-2.5 GHz or so.
https://techcrunch.com/2022/03/14/inflation-is-real-google-c...
Discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30671997
Also (after the acqusition by F5 in 2019?) more features are kept away from the open source version compared to HAProxy.
It takes a little effort to fully understand the configuration file format (hint: you've got to read the documentation, not just look at examples to fully grok it), but it's so worth it, IMO.
It's also a nice treat to have the founder and technical leader (Willy Tarreau) of the HAProxy company being so active in the community, so many years later (the initital release was in 2001). I regularly see him answering e.g. newbie questions.
(HAProxy docs: https://docs.haproxy.org/ - pick 2.8/LTS)
- It happened almost a full two years ago, well before the LLM explosion.
- The AI girlfriend startup is a YC company: https://www.ycombinator.com/companies/replika
- This is the first person convicted of treason in the UK for 40+ years
- Edited: That crossbow is and looks like a serious weapon.
Write a tool that can fetch a URL over HTTP/1.1 (and nothing else). Use a memory safe language. Support the most commonly used curl CLI options. Come up with a suitable name for the distribution but make sure that the actual installed binary is called curl.
I find it somewhat incredible from a pure engineering point of view that Trinity worked in the first test and that both Little Boy (Test #2) and Fat Man (Test #3) also worked.
According to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demon_core Feynman was the person behind that expression.
Scientists referred to this flirting with the possibility of a nuclear chain reaction as "tickling the dragon's tail", based on a remark by physicist Richard Feynman, who compared the experiments to "tickling the tail of a sleeping dragon".
Some examples:
Ambarella S3L: https://github.com/OpenIPC/firmware/tree/master/general/pack...
Some HiSilicon chipset: https://github.com/OpenIPC/firmware/tree/master/general/pack...
Edit: A smaller subset of sensors have some code here:
The proton channel OTOP1 is a sensor for the taste of ammonium chloride
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-41637-4 (web layout)
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-41637-4.epdf (print layout)
https://forum.kicad.info/t/reproducing-a-pcb-from-scanned-im...