ytdl()
{
mkdir /tmp/ytdl && cd /tmp/ytdl
for URL in "$@" ; do youtube-dl -o '%(title)s.%(ext)s' "$URL" --restrict-filenames; done ;
mv /tmp/ytdl/* ~/Desktop/
rm -rf /tmp/ytdl
exit
}3,861 karma · joined December 14, 2012
tom at tom brossman dot com
ytdl()
{
mkdir /tmp/ytdl && cd /tmp/ytdl
for URL in "$@" ; do youtube-dl -o '%(title)s.%(ext)s' "$URL" --restrict-filenames; done ;
mv /tmp/ytdl/* ~/Desktop/
rm -rf /tmp/ytdl
exit
}Hope it never happens but if they do with pharmaceuticals what they did with everything else they sell, it's only a matter of time before users are physically harmed.
Let's be optimistic though, I hope this helps them finally get their shit together and control the rampant counterfeiting going on right under their nose.
No, it's your last resort if you must slow down. Better drivers learn to coast, down-shift, or tricks such as using the slight uphill grade of a roadway to adjust speed without resorting to braking.
Next time you are driving and have good visibility far ahead in a long line of cars (such as approaching a big hill) watch for the cars with the brake lights coming on constantly. These are the less capable drivers, and once you spot them you will see them making other mistakes. For example, one trick I've learned is to watch for the driver's hand resting on the turn signal stalk in adjacent lanes as I approach. This is a tell that they are intending to cut me off. When I spot it, I can back off to anticipate them, or be more aggressive and accelerate to close the gap they were aiming for.
I note you are using multiple tracking technologies, each of which have some Terms & Conditions you must conform to. Your embedded Google Analytics code carries the following condition, for example: "You must post a Privacy Policy and that Privacy Policy must provide notice of Your use of cookies that are used to collect data. You must disclose the use of Google Analytics, and how it collects and processes data."[0]
I see something called 'Hotjar' on the page too, and I imagine they have their own responsible disclosure and opt-out requirements, but one of my browser add-ons is blocking their site entirely and there is no way I'm disabling it to confirm my suspicions.[1]
Launching so soon after the GDPR came into effect, my only recommendation is 'begin to think about privacy' and consider adding a privacy policy page, so visitors know what is happening behind the scenes. Just be upfront about it, and consider removing any tracking that is not absolutely essential. Imagine a user uploads PDFs about a sensitive or personal topic, and visitors later discover you were silently tracking them without disclosing it. Are you OK with that?
You might pay slightly more, but I believe Gandi operate a significantly better service, catering to shrewd users (I don't work there or have any financial interest in the matter, just a happy customer).
In fairness, Namecheap seem like a pretty decent second-choice, and most of my ire is reserved for all the 'baby's first domain name' bottom feeders out there.
The strange thing is it's one of those conversation stoppers, the other person usually gives me a funny look and does not reply at all. This is perfect and I recommend trying it out.
Perhaps the author meant there was no 'universal' Linux implementation, however it's been available for a while in certain distros.
A quote from the article: "The researchers found that in the most polluted areas, available solar energy decreased as much as 35 percent, or 1.5 kilowatt-hours per square meter per day. That is enough energy to power a vacuum cleaner for one hour, wash twelve pounds of laundry, or run a laptop for five to 10 hours."
But you know what they really loved? McDonald's kept running a promotion where you could get ten hamburgers or cheeseburgers for something like $2 or $5, and they would constantly make quick runs to the local drive-through at meal time, then burst in the kitchen entrance shouting and waving the McDonalds bag around. All work would stop and I would be called to bring my extra prep container of guacamole so a spoonful of that could be added to each burger and everyone would wolf them down. We're talking like ten Mexican dudes and myself, and 40-60 little hamburgers disappearing in a couple minutes. The executive chef was so disappointed and he'd just shake his head and go sit in his office.
I still prefer tacos to hamburgers though.
! Disable link preview popups on Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org##.mwe-popups
It's just a div with the class ".mwe-popups", and using your ad blocker will persist the change after clearing cookies, which the preference setting (mentioned elsewhere here) does not.For Wikipedia in different languages, just change the subdomain in the filter.
Not sure about the the down-voters, but I was just about to post a 'citation needed' comment dismissing this as crazy talk, and I was surprised to discover it is actually true: https://www.fastmail.com/help/files/secure-website.html
Not exactly. While it is possible to become a Guardian 'supporter', and contribute financially in exchange for ad-free browsing after you identify yourself by logging in, you are not free from tracking by third-party ad companies as you browse their site.
The parent comment you are responding to said "I think the business model would generally incentivize much more user-friendly operational decisions than an ad-sponsored approach does." and while this gives you a superficially cleaner browsing experience, ad companies continue to track you as you browse the Guardian's website, harvesting data which can be used to manipulate you elsewhere on the web.
The Guardian could choose to disable all third-party trackers for logged-in paying supporters, but they do not. For privacy conscious readers, the only way to achieve what you want is to install an ad-blocker and a browser extension such as Privacy Badger. Contributing to the paper provides little or no privacy benefit, though it's always a good idea to support quality journalism, so if you do it, do it for that reason alone.
I'm curious, what tools have you tried? I ask because the default screenshot tool works perfectly for stills (including stills of video playing in a window or full-screen), and the few video screen recording tools I've tried all worked perfectly. At the moment I'm using Kazam on 16.04 with the default Nouveau drivers, and a quick test with Chromium playing a video stream + Totem simultaneously playing a local video file confirms that everything is captured no problem. Full screen, arbitrary windows, all tested and working.
Tl;dr try Kazam, unless I'm misunderstanding the issue you describe?
You can whitelist specific tweets to keep, and set a threshold for favorites or retweets above which the tweets are preserved. For example, if you tweet something and ten people retweet it, the script will save it forever. If you tweet something that no one retweets or favorites, it's gone after 30 days. I call it a 'socially curated' feed, since old tweets are basically worthless to anyone but strangers wanting to profile you.
And props to Mike McQuaid over on GitHub for originally creating this tool, and for helping me adapt it to my use-case.
No surprises, the Omnia updates itself and reboots automatically (you get an email warning of you want to intervene) and everything 'just works'.
Presumably it would be marketed to 'Adult' performers, some of who will be technically minded and understand how to use SSH, but Nextcloud will have wider appeal and includes an easy to navigate GUI.
Personally, I'm using both but I don't expect everyone to do the same.
The porn industry is often cited as being innovative / early adopters. As nerds let's help them demonstrate why self-hosting and decentralized tech is the way forward.
Find out where the site is being hosted, usually through a WHOIS search, and contact the hosting company's abuse department. Try a web search for a template of a takedown notice appropriate for the jurisdiction. For example, if the site is hosted in the USA you can send the host a standard DMCA takedown notice. Make sure the wording is correct.
You can go to a lawyer for reassurance (and if you can afford one), but for a simple copyright infringement notice sent to a web host, this is not super complicated and you can get it done yourself.
Obviously you are 'burning a bridge' here with the company that interviewed you, and you will never do work for them again, but they are treating you badly and it's OK to get more aggressive in your dealings with them. If they later claim this was a misunderstanding and remove your webpage, go ahead and invoice them at full market rate for the work anyway. They may tell you no but it's worth a try. These are all good skills to have if this happens to you again.
Both Apache and Nginx (and others?) log IP addresses by default. The expected result of this is that storing IP addresses in server logs is widespread, useful for troubleshooting, and entirely normal.
In fairness, they do disclose this up front. "Please note that devices dispatched from and sold by Amazon are automatically registered on CheckMend and the National Mobile Property Register (NMPR), this information is shared in accordance with the Amazon.co.uk Privacy Notice"
I'm not going to preach that one way is right and the other is wrong - I just want to point out that they are two quite different schemes. Also, you sound well educated and underemployed - I wish you good luck and hope you get paid closer to what you are worth soon.
It's more complicated than deciding not to have a Facebook account, though that's a great first step.