https://optuna.readthedocs.io/en/stable/reference/generated/...
1,127 karma · joined November 15, 2011
https://optuna.readthedocs.io/en/stable/reference/generated/...
The biggest use case for MongoDB was for huMongous data. Obvs MongoDB was a good fit, because of the name.
However, caching might be a sweet spot for these multi-modal and large context LLMs. Take a bunch of documents and perform reasoning tasks to distill the knowledge down into something like a knowledge graph, to be used in RAG.
https://github.com/tkellogg/Jump-Location
Which was fun and all, but eventually replaced by a pure PowerShell implementation that's become far more active:
The reason I didn’t do mistral the first time is because I’m lazy. I gave myself 3-4 hours to get a first pass done, and getting a local model running seemed unnecessarily difficult. It would be a great addition though.
> I think interpretable is a overloaded term.
Author here, this is basically the tl;dr of the paper I kept referencing throughout the post. My take, I hope I was clear, is that understanding the inner workings isn't very helpful, except for ML engineers trying to debug a model.
I think I'd break the terms down something like
- debuggable: The traditional definition of interpretability
- trustable: What I talk about here
The fediverse can simply be. Growth isn't required for survival. Operating a mastodon instance can be quite cheap because all you have to pay for is hardware costs & power, etc. No salaries, no R&D investments. Only build features that users want, there's no hidden incentives.
They're difficult to compare