tjfl

> If you build a house on rotten stilts, and some neighborhood kid comes and kicks one of them, it's not the kid's fault when the house collapses.

It's at least partially the kid's fault. Don't go kicking stilts under houses.

What's a PUA type?

> All of which require a warrant before they can be used as evidence against you.

Only if law enforcement wants to seize them. If the owner or representative of the business shares them no warrant is needed.

He’s still the creator.

He set the bar very high.

It's at least a far cry from an _advertised_ national gun show surveillance program. The only time I've been able to confidently identify license plate recognition is on the tollway. I don't think all of the setups are as obvious.

What would a reliable source be for "never"?

> Obama telling Putin to "cut it out" isn't enough. No matter what is happening behind the scenes. Our next president might not even go that far.

The article states, "Eventually they discovered that the Russian-speaking hacker..." I'd like to see more than a Russian-speaking hacker before attributing this to the Russian government.

> Bill Gates, for example, had a trust fund from his grandfather that gave him a cushion in case he failed.

Do you happen to have a source? I'd not heard this and was curious as to the amount.

> Are they reporting what is a mis-identification of automated vulnerability scanning?

If DHS doesn't have approval/authority, isn't an automated vulnerability scan a cyberattack?

Aren't they?

> They are in an industry where the leader has a big natural advantage, and they are in that lead by a large margin.