936 karma · joined June 8, 2010
Reversing climate change. Carbon removal, direct air capture, biochar, rock weathering, planetary cooling, sun reflection, the works.
I'm the co-founder of AirMiners (http://airminers.com): the place for scientists, entrepreneurs, and engineers mining carbon from the air.
227 startup graduates from our accelerator have raised $250M of venture capital and grants, and sold more than $100M of carbon removal credits.
My talk on carbon removal here: https://www.ted.com/talks/tito_jankowski_take_carbon_out_of_the_air_and_make_useful_things_with_it
New to carbon removal? Check out the AirMiners Boot Up http://bootup.airminers.com
We also launched a new course in collaboration with Nasdaq: https://www.nasdaq.com/carbon-academy
Join my weekly carbon removal newsletter: http://airminers.com/newsletter
An economy that seizes climate solutions can zoom ahead in terms of innovation, manufacturing, and enforcement. The changing climate is one of the biggest economic opportunities we've ever seen in human history, but somehow we've convinced ourselves that it's not only the worst non-opportunity ever but somehow would break capitalism. The richest man on the planet makes electric cars.
Working on your own carbon footprint is a $100M marketing trick played on you by oil companies like BP.
Leah Stokes' new book offers instead a "carbon wave" -- how to evaluate and maximize your impact at a local, state, national, and global level. Here's a LinkedIn post. She's got a new book coming out about this: https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:share:7496265286...
We'll talk climate science, impacts, and what we can do to avert the worst impacts of the worst El Niño in human history.
Come join! https://luma.com/tu0uvbx1
And well said. For some context, "carbon footprint" and this idea of individual emissions actions to solve climate change started as a marketing campaign by British Petroleum. Even the term "climate change" instead of "global warming" came from a U.S. Bush-era policy memo, because the term global warming "frightened" people.
The book I linked above proposes a different frame, managing your impact at a regional, state, national level etc.
It ditches the concept of "Carbon footprint" (originally created by oil companies) and gives direction on how to join together and make local, state, and national policy change.
I pre-ordered the book today!
You can also come to our El Niño action session next week: https://luma.com/tu0uvbx1
Burke/Hsiang/Miguel [1] find poorest 40% of countries down ~75% and richest 20% up slightly.
So "we get richer" and "grandkids are worse off" are both true. Depends whose grandkids!
Logistically (from wikipedia): Elderly people living by themselves had never faced such extreme heat before and did not know how to react or were too mentally or physically impaired by the heat to make the necessary adaptations themselves. Elderly people with family support or those residing in nursing homes were more likely to have others who could make the adjustments for them. This led to unexpected survival rates with the weakest group having fewer deaths than the more physically fit; most of the heat victims came from the group of elderly not requiring constant medical care; often childless women who lived alone.
Academic source: https://comptes-rendus.academie-sciences.fr/biologies/articl...
I'm putting together an event next Wednesday, We should have climate scientist Zeke Hausfather there to weigh in: https://luma.com/tu0uvbx1
In terms of having a longer cooling period with volcanoes, what happened historically was you had several volcanic eruptions in a row that caused something else to happen entirely -- sea ice restoration which caused a feedback loop. Generally, more sea ice begets more sea ice (Effectively, you're trading black ocean surface that absorbs light/heat for white ice that reflects light/heat. And so you get this feedback loop, more ice, cooler temps, even more ice) Anyway, The More You Know Star about some climate history stuff. (One issue with global warming is we're nearing the opposite end of that feedback loop, where less sea ice begets less sea ice and everything melts super fast. For shorthand, you can say that the temperature of Earth is likely rising as slowly as it will during the rest of our lifetimes. The ice is melting as slowly as it will for the rest of our lifetime. The sea level is rising as slowly as it will for the rest of our lifetime. etc)
The other thing to point out here is that volcanic emissions just mask warming caused by greenhouse gasses (ignoring the ability to start feedback loops). At the extreme end, for example, human IQ starts to suffer around 1,000 parts per million of carbon dioxide, so no matter what the temperature is in that scenario it's likely a decent idea to deal with carbon dioxide.
The timing is still being finalized but we should have climate scientist Zeke Hausfather there to give his take, and then we can talk about actions to avoid the worst impacts of El Niño this cycle, what innovators can build etc. I heard one idea of building modular battery powered Starlink systems that activate when the cell system gets knocked out.
But yeah, if nothing changes El Niño this year will likely be fucked.