I don’t like that the rich potential of this platform and hardware is often wasted for cheap upsells
6,774 karma · joined July 2, 2009
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/tibbon; my proof: https://keybase.io/tibbon/sigs/ATQbF8yqkEUNf6JLuNxyZbNvmQzq1jlUJFAxDp4VOrk ]
I don’t like that the rich potential of this platform and hardware is often wasted for cheap upsells
With a real bank or exchange, I'd expect some ability to sweep up my accounts and get a paper check for 50 cents if needed.
In theory, we aligned the ladders in a manner that Principal sits parallel to Directors in the management track. I'm expected to impact org-wide culture, policy, technology direction, strategy, etc... but so rarely am I allowed into the rooms where decisions are being made, let alone discussed. I don't know (at all) what is being discussed, and by the time I find out about it things are set in stone.
I do what I can with mentoring and team culture, and lead by example for code-related things, but that is all very zoomed in and tactical. We've been told explicitly that we're holding off on having people write technical strategy/vision until we have organization-wide direction from those in upper Leadership. That has been the promise for a long time, but for one reason or another keeps failing to materialize.
At this point, upper Leadership won't even meet with someone of my rank/position, as they only respect others with VP to C-level titles to work with.
This is the type of reality I fear encountering at other organizations. I worry that despite the allure of Principal title, the reality is that too often such things happen and that when it comes down to it, VPs and C-levels only respect similar, and want Principals or Distinguished Engineers simply as "advanced fixers" for problems in a short time.
But... few would probably agree to it for non-executive positions. Executives of course, play by different rules and can have all sorts of special things negotiated.
Will Putin or terrorists hold back from using it in terrible ways if they have it available to them?
"There should be one-- and preferably only one --obvious way to do it.", unless it is how to setup your environment.
I only use Python every few months, and it is always a struggle.
In comparison, "cargo build" works 98% of the time just after "git checkout"
How can these two things be held in balance? If it is open source entirely, can't I use the training data and tool in any way I want? What guardrails prevent me from using it to generate hate speech?
Given the compute power needed to train/run it; where are people going to do that in any accessible way that doesn't only allow people with a supercomputing cluster at home to use it?