thysultan

If it worked it wouldn't be happening, the fact that it is happening, and to well known country's proofs they don't work and is profitable for country B and C for it to continue to not work.

This not withstanding the obfuscation of country of origin that can happen If country B and C really wanted to work together.

Add Country C into the mix: It doesn't produce carbon but doesn't have tariff's on Country B.

>It's pretty simple, this has been thought out

You and others alike have clearly not thought this out as the scenario i have layered out is already happening with other tariff-able commodities.

country B sells to country C that does the final packaging and then sells it to you.

This is happening right now if you haven't already noticed.

You tax carbon, country B now has an advantage over you. You loose!

Now all your products are produced in country B, you've changed nothing and country B is probably using coal so you're worse off from your initial goal.

You loose double!

You tax industrial bitcoin miners that you can detect, country A now has an advantage over you. You loose!

You actually haven't changed anything it has just moved to another country that is probably using coal. You loose!

It's not an attack vector precisely because of that. Another scenario is the 1% could just then continue mining non-empty blocks from where the attacker left of which would make them the most accurate blockchain with regards to proof of work, this case is even more passive than the hard fork option if you are in sync with the attacker at the time of the attack.

For the first attack listed you'd need to be the 99% of mining power at which point the 1% could also just fork and leave you to your endeavours.

DeepFuckingValue(Reddit username), Keith Gill and Roaring Kitty(youtube username) are the same person.

>that uses tons and tons of energy to even exist and operate

Compared to what? The banking industry? Do you know how much it takes to send/secure 100 tons of gold? bitcoin comparatively is minuscule, energy use is going to increase whether you like it or not, the alternative is starvation and death, africa alone is going to double the energy use before long, in the process saving millions from starvation.

Oh, so not the material nominal pound for pound cost?

Plastic is more expensive?

Think of it as a productive carbon sink for all that ancient dead organic matter.

You could exit the country and do whatever you want if it's come to that.

It will be easier than you think: You could just send crypto to a friend and they wire me the equivalent in $ with india being non-the-wiser.

They expect it to reach 500-1000, if they are patient and right they'll probably find gold.

Maybe cause $BB&B is close to $BB, either the bots are mistaking it for $BB or the WSB "retards" are. Either way there's a bit of a "rocketship emoji" drive for $BB on WSB.

ⓘ This claim about election fraud is disputed.

Yes!

uBlock origin is the biggest thing keeping me from going to Safari, that and the Stylus extension(or something like it).

The appeal of gravitational propulsion is in replacing xyz propulsion fuel with electricity regardless of medium(vacuum or not).

>In JavaScript

My heart rate is just now over the roof

Then stop using the word global warming, poor marketing, when it gets cools(which it will) instead of warm it starts to look and sound a con. The more enlightened skeptics are more so "human caused" climate change skeptics than anything else, with the sun as their main point of origin.

Can an adversary launch a a first attack, given the latency this introduces? can an adversary await for a solar flare to disturb comms to launch?

All governments would have to follow suit in lock step for that to work, at which point you have far bigger problems, i.e why not just nuke the internet all together, far easier.

>Isn't that the same as printing money

Yes, if electricity was FREE, at which point printing money is the best next logical step as you've achieved free energy with utopia just around the corner.

gasoline cars also use a battery to initiate the engine.

battery

Like how a gun works, essentially a battery for the initial motion, using the subsequent motion storing some for the next initial motion.

>Where would you get the energy to split the water?

From a battery.

The idea is to use water as the fuel and convert to hydrogen just in time for combustion.

This is like awaiting for Moore's law for your apps to run faster. 30 years is a lifetime in post-y2k tech years.