2,796 karma · joined December 13, 2012
thomasalwyndavis at gmail dot com @ajaxdavis on x
As other commenters have said, that is just my personal opinion, I have zero evidence to back that up lol
I've been building minimal open source versions of those features for JSON Resume -> https://registry.jsonresume.org/thomasdavis/letter
I removed the interview feature because it didn't seem to have much value but I will be sure to give your implementation a spin.
I haven't released it yet, but it feels amazing when I play with the prototype is a feature where you essentially talk to a job counsellor and it writes your resume as you go. It feels very natural and using 4o etc gives fantastic results.
Though it was the indie/personal feel they had as a registrar, I might look for alternatives.
I also play with LLM's often, for creative side projects and work commercially with them (prompt engineering stuff)
I don't find it far fetched that individual poetry can be indistinguishable at times when AI generated. I was asking it to write in iambic pentameter (sonnets) and it consistenly got the structure right, it's approach to the provided themes were as complicated or glib as I wanted. But that's all subjective right, which leads me to my main point.
My view of poetry over the years, has always been centred around the poet, the poet living in a time and place. As a generalisation most people buy into the artists life because it may represent some part of themself.
If someone managed to write an intriguing corpus of texts using LLM's that was extolled, I think that would almost be besides the point. What is important is the narrators life, ups and downs, joys and woes. Their ability to convey a memorable story even heavily relying on AI would still be impressive. Anyway sounding a bit wanky I will stop lol
(I do think LLM's write a little too perfect and that is easy to think it is not human, but you can kinda prompt them to throw in errors too so who knows)
I can't tell if it is a UX thing or if it also doesn't suit my mental model.
I religiously use Copilot, and then paste stuff into Claude or ChatGPT (both pro) when needed.
Curious question, up until age 18 did you have a similar upbringing?
* Remote: Yes
* Willing to relocate: Yes - Australia
Technologies: Mostly Javascript. I've coded in pretty much all non functional languages though. Most of the databases sql/nosql. Comfortable with gCloud/aws/heroku etc. Mostly worked with node/rails/laravel/python/golang backends.
17+ years experience
* Résumé/CV: https://registry.jsonresume.org/thomasdavis
* GitHub: https://github.com/thomasdavis/
I'm a full stack web developer who can build apps from the ground up. I've worked mostly at startups so I am used to wearing many hats. I am a very product focused developer who prioritizes user feedback first and foremost. I'm generally very flexible when investigating new roles. Nothing too big or small.
I've had a couple dual boot windows and I couldn't even figure out how to code on it effectively. (web dev js stuff)
To this day I don't understand if I am meant to have git bash, command prompt or powershell, or all of them or what.
Mac's are reliable, but I personally find them clunky for standard development.
Ubuntu is my safe place, the UX/DX makes the most sense to me.
libbpf: sec '.reluprobe/gotls_exit_read_register': relo #5: insn #148 against 'active_go_read_args_map'
libbpf: prog 'probe_exit_go_tls_read': found map 17 (active_go_read_args_map, sec 30, off 528) for insn #148
libbpf: Error in bpf_object__probe_loading():Function not implemented(38). Couldn't load trivial BPF program. Make sure your kernel supports BPF (CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL=y) and/or that RLIMIT_MEMLOCK is set to big enough value.
libbpf: failed to load object 'main.bpf.o'
failed to load BPF object: function not implementedDid you happen to look at how the load on the 8 cores looked at any given time?
If you were to do it as the post author states, it would look like this (bad)
<ul>
<li><Link active={'/home' === window.location.pathname} to="/home">Home</Link></li>
<li><Link active={'/about' === window.location.pathname} to="/about">About</Link></li>
<li><Link active={'/contact-us' === window.location.pathname} to="/contact-us">Contact Us</Link></li>
</ul>I wonder if you could make a video of how an individual could use it effectively in a pragmatic sense e.g. networking, research
(after more playing around I get the UX, very powerful indeed)
(feedback: add some controls for filtering (dates etc), relevancy, color islands slightly, just general UX improvements and I would probably pay a few dollars a month for this)
(feedback: when looking at a user, you have to zoom really far in before results start appearing. it should probably show labels/results if less than X amount of data points are in your viewport.)
(feedback: Is there "Explore more users" section the more related users to the current profile? It would seem so, but not immediately clear. And if it is, none of my related users have me as a related user in their profile.
===
This is really inspiring work, hats off!
Three years is nothing, and money isn't always reliable coming in.
Nor does it factor in some unexpected expenses.
But you can just go to https://registry.jsonresume.org, login with github, create the gist, and then your resume is automatically "deployed". And it is stored on github gist, so data is yours, and has revisions as a nice added benefit.
Is there a reason why Python has taken this long to get a mature alternative to "requirements.txt"?
Does anyone know why/how it maintains state if you tab out? Does Chrome eventually try to clean up the cache or is it locked in?