136 karma · joined May 16, 2015
Also curious if there might be some improvements if you dont rely on semantic similarity and just do all the pairwise "how related are these memories and in what way" LLM test like https://www.superagent.sh/blog/reag-reasoning-augmented-gene....
I'm imagining a backend database of creator-submitted content. The LLM runs RAG on it, pays the creators it relied on to synthesize answers a microtransaction. Then also sells the Q-and-A as a subscription service to the end user. Maybe payouts are conditional on positive user feedback. The solution can also flag queries it sees that don't have great answers yet.
Same moat as search, not reliant on advertising.
this says you need an API key but I think I found some way to call this without one… You might be able to improve classification by either incorporating the dewey decimals of the books mentioned on a podcast or fine-tuning a model based on known book titles (or maybe there are book summaries somewhere) to known dewey decimals from OCLC.
https://weekend-collection.s3.amazonaws.com/Catalog+-+Feb+17...
Pretty much has solved my book recommendation pain point.