1,084 karma · joined November 25, 2021
For small players a 3% savings isn't worth the administrative overhead of paying apple separately.
Apple is begging for another lawsuit over this.
Unless accessibility becomes a first class concern, game engines are not going to be good choices for desktop applications.
China recently allocated $41 Billion just to improve chip production. The US hasn't spent like that since the Apollo program.
To get that kind of commitment you the strong backing of senators from a dozen different states. It rarely happens in non military projects, and when it does it's a boondoggle. Look to the SLS project, $12 billion spent to recycle space shuttle engines from the 70s and 80s.
I suspect that in any applications where IP is not the best choice, the best choice will be a minimal protocol that doesn't try to reimplements everything IP does.
It doesn't provide a consistent enough api across all of the language backends. For example, the tink http framework only targets node and php.
If something goes wrong with a powerwall, I don't have enough followers on X to get the attention of someone at Tesla.
Arpanet was started 1969 and you had to be part of a small number of institutions to have access.
Most crypto users are already using online exchanges and wallets, so from their perspective it already is centralized.
True decentralized crypto only has niche applications outside a small number of enthusiasts.
It might mean less bug reports from users who find bugs, but aren't deeply affected by them.
The upside is a lot less garbage in your issue tracker.
Definitely not googles finest device.