thatxliner

These things can be on Arxiv??

How would you set up tool installations? Inside the CI or inside the script?

You can, if you press Get Info, you can set the default application for ALL files of that type

Nah what ads in HN is crazy

The handler function is per connection, so it can handle multiple connections in parallel

> verified easy for humans, harder for AI

Isn’t that the premise behind the CAPTCHA?

What about https://lucia-auth.com/

How does this compare to https://github.com/ast-grep/ast-grep

Isn’t npm VC-backed?

I would be fine if you used my data to train your AI models as long as I’m able to use your models for free in return. If not, you can’t have my data.

I would be fine if you use my data to train your AI models if you let me use your models for free. If you can’t do that, you can’t have my data.

So... isn't this basically just a CAPTCHA

Here's the thing: the use of AI is an underlying implementation detail that the customer shouldn't need (and likely doesn't) care about.

Looks like a GitHub markdown render

If you want to cut costs, I would recommend you try experimenting with Meta’s new Llama 3 model

...and then we start simulating human interactions to get a better understanding of the impact of campaigns, the effectiveness of advertisements, etc.

Helps with larger apps that are not solely Next.js

Something interesting to write about

Supabase + SvelteKit = SupaKit

The problem with writing raw queries is that you don’t get that sweet sweet type checking

What about offline sync

Just wondering, how does the logistics of pricing it at a one time purchase work? Isn’t there a $99/year Apple developer program?

Isn’t that just little alchemy

Isn’t this just Universal Control?

I got the exact same comment on one of my repos as well

The thing about the Zed workflow that I don't understand is local servers. Say I were to develop a full-stack web app using some frontend meta-framework (e.g., Next.js) and a backend running locally for development (e.g., Supabase). How would that workflow work with Zed? I need that live preview/reload available to be productive. Some sort of feedback loop.

> Rust's addition of operator overloading is also a perplexingly bad decision. I don't think there is a single worse design decision in C++ or Rust than allowing someone to redefine what + means on some arbitrary type.

Why is that? Won’t it be more ergonomic than needing to call, say `.add`, when you want to do something clearly similar to addition. It’s just sugar, no?

In Java, there is no operator overloading, so if you want to compare 2 strings by contents rather than their memory addresses, you have to use a `.equals` method. Comparing 2 strings by their contents is the most common use case, so it not being the default is a design flaw (similar to how you need to `break` out of a `case` in most languages).

If you can’t overload the addition operator, then why have a whole language construct that can only be used on primitive integers and floats?

People have been talking about using ECC (elliptic-curve cryptography) instead of RSA but I can’t really find a way to use ECC for asymmetric encryption (not signing). I’m pretty sure only RSA (instead of ECC) can be used for asymmetric encryption (disregarding the quantum-resistant algorithms which I haven’t looked into), unless I’m missing something important?

Honestly, I don’t really understand the advantages (or the point of) NixOS over something like Docker.