533 karma · joined July 17, 2024
> You must not share projects that mostly consist [of LLM-generated code]
> Such projects having an unclear copyright status
There is no bright-line threshold at which a code contribution becomes copyrightable (and therefore relevant). It is a legal question determined by courts. However, nobody in practice has any difficulty determining whether their code is copyrightable.
Codeberg is essentially asking/demanding that "your code" coincides with "code you hold the copyright for". This responsibility can be delegated to other humans, but not to LLMs.
Yes.
> What next? You don't have legs so everyone around you must carry you?
Too stupid to engage with.
Obviously society has to accommodate (i.e. spend money for) people who are disabled or unable to interact with it due to inalienable features of their body. Anything other than that is just cruel.
[1]:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Freedom_Deal#Cambodi...
Why? It's not like they did the hard work. It's disgraceful that this kind of commons enclosure has been allowed in the first place.
You can test it here, if you like: https://www.mathjax.org/#demo
Disagreeing is fine, arguing is fine, but you have to keep a level head at all times or you will embarrass yourself. It is just as bad (probably worse) to have an emotionally charged argument with someone junior to or level with you than with someone senior to you.
If you want to share specific directories, you can just put the shared directory in a common location, set it to be owned by some group, and make both users a member of that group. I don't see anything not-straightforward in there?
Isn't this classic wrongful termination?
I think this is kind of a ticking time bomb with a lot of companies depending on personal devices for 2FA.