teabee89

Unfortunately it does not have magic link fallback when passkeys are not available.

I tried Hungarian. For the 3rd response it switched to Spanish, but with a Hungarian accent which was amusing but I'm not sure that was the intention :D

There's also: Multiple values[1]

"Generalized the result type of blocks and functions to allow for multiple values; in addition, introduced the ability to have block parameters:

- Function types allow more than one result

- Block types can be arbitrary function types"

[1] https://www.w3.org/TR/wasm-core-2/appendix/changes.html#mult...

Here: https://www.w3.org/TR/wasm-core-2/appendix/changes.html

I recommend reading "What NPM Should Do Today To Stop A New Colors Attack Tomorrow" by Russ Cox (Go's lead): https://research.swtch.com/npm-colors

Somewhat related to this is the excellent presentation "Why greatness cannot be planned: myth of the objective" by Kenneth Stanley which I highly recommend! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dXQPL9GooyI

"Could there be limits to growth?" Yes 100% (you cannot extract indefinitely more and more every year from finite resources), the debate is simply when we'll peak for a given ressource (20 years, 100 years, 1 million years) and the size of such an impact on the economy.

Would you mind elaborating? I find him very convincing, but it's not my field.

I would recommend reading/watching Steve Keen's critique of Nordhaus's work (e.g., https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vwwvZ8g5eHE). Steve Keen is the author of Debunking Economics.

In addition to price, I would like to see, for any CO2 capture tech, the estimated CO2 emission amount with scope 3 accounting (i.e., including the CO2 emitted in the entire supply chain, amortized by the estimated non-infinite lifetime).

This is really simple but edge from 6 to 1 should not cross node 4 in the visualization. Also it would be useful to show how to escape or if escaping works at all: how to escape ":" or "(1)"? multiline?

In the wiki an int compare(int * , int * ) function [1] is used, which is odd if the elements are not pointers (when P is defined). Shouldn't it be changed to int compare(int, int) when P is defined? I wonder if it impacts at all the benchmarks.

[1] https://github.com/glouw/ctl/blob/49b90312f9473057fd2ed77941...

Is there a legal framework that allows company to convert OP's shares into debt to OP and essentially by the debt for $0? The debt would only have to be paid if certain conditions are met.

The company's ownership is divided in shares, also called equity. A cap(italization) table details the distribution of equity. In this example, 40.8% (= 51% * 80%) for founder 1, 39.2% (= 49% * 80%) for founder 2 (assuming it's OP), 10% for investor and 10% for something called options that may be granted in the future to new employees that allows them to buy shares of the company at a low price. 4-year reverse vesting with 1-year cliff means that if one of the founders leaves before 1 year of signing the contract, they are forced to sell at no profit (still, not $0) the entirety of their shares to the other shareholders. After 1 year of staying at the company, they may keep 1/4 of their shares and are forced to sell only the rest. Following that 1 year mark, they earn the right every month at the company to keep ~0.833% (= 40% / 48 as there are 48 months in 4 years) of their shares and forced to sell the rest. At the 4 year mark of staying, they are no longer forced to sell any of the initial set of shares. It does not apply to any future grants for which new conditions or new schedules may apply.

Yes, it's a variant of the Jevons paradox: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jevons_paradox

Anybody using https://magic.link/ ?

Agreed that AST diff is better, but there's also just better diff algorithms like the lesser-known Tichy diff: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220439403_The_Strin... that I learned from http://bryanpendleton.blogspot.com/2010/04/more-study-of-dif... ; it seems to preserve more context and is better suited for big code refactors.

What is the source? Mainly are we talking about cash or are we talking about money created by banks via credit?

"You can't always get what you want" -- The Rolling Stones

There's a fancy name for this effect: Jevons paradox https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jevons_paradox

This reminds me that there is video footage online today of a person who witnessed President Lincoln's murder: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1RPoymt3Jx4

At Kennedy Space Center, the Space Shuttle simulation was pretty amazing. I believe the trick was to make us think we were sitting at rest at a 90 degree angle, when in fact it must have been less, such that when the shuttle did take off in the simulation the seat made an even higher angle (+ shaking). And the sudden lowering of the angle (when engine cuts off and we're supposed to float) was a pretty damn amazing illusion too. I definitely recommend it.

I'm wondering if it would be confusing with just a dot inside the circle.

or write 9 like in most parts of Europe, as a lower-case g, and write the letter g with a loop.

I don't drink any. I take power naps if needed.

I was afraid that another AI instance would absorb me. In fact I kept deleting my files (which turned out to be useful) to prevent other AIs to learn from me. Would have been cool to see incoming connections of dumber AIs. Loved the game though, thanks!

Reducing per unit energy consumption (aka increasing energy efficiency) is not only very different from reducing global energy consumption, but it can often lead to an increase in global energy consumption. This is called Jevons paradox: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jevons_paradox and is quite an interesting topic.

I know about energy intensity, and yes it is going down, but not by enough to compensate the growth of consumption, which is the fallacy i'm pointing out. It has another name: Jevons paradox: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jevons_paradox

Dematerialization is the biggest fallacy in the industry. Data centers need energy to run. Buying the latest servers, network equipments, iPhones and more every year or two, requires an enormous amount of energy. GDP is directly correlated with energy, so there is no sign of change: an economy cannot grow without energy. I wish more people understood the economy from a physics standpoint.

Thank you for being the voice of reason <3 Small correction though on your last paragraph: nuclear is not a renewable energy, but it does not emit carbon.