taytus

They should do a similar report about their communication team. This was horrible mismanaged.

Anthropic is making the exact same mistake OpenAI did: lack of focus. Release, release, release, all good apps, all full of bugs. This is a massive mess and people aren't talking enough about how bad all of this is.

You are arguing something different. My point is that they must apply these restrictions. Do I think they could have calculated their growth a little better? Yes, of course, but hindsight is 20/20.

Like or not, openai isn't having the same compute strain, meaning this was predictable.

They are not dumb restrictions. They just don't have the compute. That is the dumb part. Dario did not secure the compute they need so now they are obviously struggling.

That has also been my experience. And if Mythos is even worse, unless you have a significantly awesome harness, sounds like pretty unusable if you don't want to risk those problems.

The stupidest people you know are getting the “you are absolutely right!!” Validation they do not need

Who said they are the enemy?

How much money did they burn on this? And for what? Nothing?

YC is back at it again.

He raises $1B, couldn't OAI, Google or Anthropic try similar approaches? Lack of funding isn't a problem those companies have. Why wouldn't they also spend $1B or 5 times that and outcompete (in theory)?

This reads like AI slop.

Another preview model? Why google keep doing this?

Honest question: why would anyone use Opus instead of this? I’m doing web development, the whole shebang, and I don’t think I need Opus right now. I know it’s supposed to be smarter, but a 2%–5% improvement doesn’t seem meaningful, especially when it costs more than double and has only a portion of the context window.

Am I getting this wrong? I would seriously appreciate any clarification here.

>You do understand that is who you’re competing with now right?

No. I'm competing with no one.

Because you are not coding, you are building. I've been coding since I was 7 years old, now I'm building.

Fascism isn't just American. If you're going to be pedantic, at least be accurate. My point: supporting an American fascist normalizes fascism everywhere

It’s not “American politics” when a guy does a Nazi salute on live TV. So thanks for showing your political inclination.

>they didn't cut-off anyone

They did banned a lot people. Later, they "unbanned" them, but your comment isn't truthful.

Could someone explain this to me? I have the same question: why Cursor team don't use Cursor to get rid of vscode base and code its super duper code editor?

I've been a paying user for years. I don't see the point anymore since claude code.

Im in between :)

Mini - small, incomplete, not good enough

Flash - good, not great, fast, might miss something.

I believethere’s also exponential dislike growing for Altman among most AI users, and that impacts how the brand/company is perceived.

on top of the prompt. It has a weird layout; I had to scroll up to see it.

Sunday? What is that?

Easy, let me try to explain: You want to achieve X, so you ask your AI companion, "How do I do X?" Your companion thinks and tries a couple of things, and they eventually work. So you say, "You know what, next time, instead of figuring it out, just do this"... that is a skill. A recipe for how to do things.

Yes, sometimes skills are more reliable, but not always. That is the biggest culprit to me so far. The fact that you cannot reliably trust these LLMs to follow steps or instructions makes them unsuitable for my applications.

>shaken my already low confidence in OpenAI

No judgment, pure curiosity. Why did you install their malware?

SEO killed the web

Honest question: What problem does this solve?