I checked out a copy based on Alan Kay's recommendation and returned it after getting about half-way through, realizing it was typical pop-science sophistry.
278 karma · joined March 16, 2016
I checked out a copy based on Alan Kay's recommendation and returned it after getting about half-way through, realizing it was typical pop-science sophistry.
Absolutely! And that's the thrust of my comment: A huge contributor to these issues is suspiciously left out.
Most store-bought jar sauce has sugar in it (and tastes gross). You can absolutely make sauce that doesn't have sugar in it, and some of the nicer jar sauces are that way also.
> or that fruit yogurt has more sugar than a Coke
Again, maybe if it's Dannon, but you can also buy plain yogurt and put fruit in it. Sweeten to taste.
> or that most breakfast cereals — even those made with whole grain — are 75 percent sugar
Maybe Post/General Mills sugar cereals, but again it's not that hard to find cereal with low sugar content.
This article argues that the problem is solved with regulation, but a lot of what we eat is influenced by government subsidy (i.e. corn/corn syrup), which makes many of the unhealthiest foods inexpensive. The article makes it sound like all processed food is loaded with sugar and that grocery shopping is dangerous. That may be true of "food deserts" but it isn't generally true.
The nutrition facts are already there. If somebody can't be bothered to see that whatever they are eating has 30g of sugar per serving, what can you really do about it?
And no, I'm not here to advocate taking your guns away. Just trying to suggest that there are certain downsides to always carrying a lethal weapon, and that given our mostly secure society, people might view it as antisocial.
The risk is far greater when there's a gun around, especially for children. Also it's a bit disingenuous to compare death figures with self-defense incidents where the outcome may have been simple property theft. Injury would be more appropriate, and even that fails as a comparison.
Statistically, it's far more likely that one of your children will kill themselves, or a friend, or each other, with your gun than it is that it will be helpful for self-defense. This is going to be a bigger deal as your kids get older.
That's a rather specific thing to agree about.
Viewed with a critical eye, is the "Dream Act" about human rights? Or is it about cheap labor? We see things like TPP which are anti-worker on their face. Who is truly pro-labor anymore? Look at Clinton's record and indifference, who is the real war-hawk? Why are the anti-Trump people chanting in Spanish and waving Mexican flags, beating people up? Trump frightens me, but his enemies are quite clearly not my friends.
Are "Leave" voters more likely to be uneducated because they're stupid? Or because they're getting shafted? Are Trump supporters more likely to be uneducated white men because they're all stupid bigots? Or because they're too getting shafted?
Lining up policies, on Trump's side you have plenty of terrible ideas many of which seem like reflexive jabs. Many of them seem unconstitutional. But on Clinton's side, you have actionable, legal, and sinister ideas that will perpetuate a status quo that is getting worse by the day for the middle and lower class.
I cannot in good conscience support either side, but I'd be lying if I said I don't secretly prefer Trump and his ideas right now, just slightly.