sumeno

Why wouldn't I trust a vibe coded app that has existed for 1 week with all my important data?

Good luck finding a company that doesn't have these people if LLMs are used

> The use of LLMs to generate or rewrite article content is prohibited

I'm not a wikipedia editor, but I assume this applies to bots as well

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Artificial_intellige...

You're absolutely right! I unintentionally used an en-dash instead of an em-dash. Here is the em-dash you requested: –

Betteridge strikes again

LLMs don't understand what they are doing, they can't explain it to you, it's just creating a reasonable sounding response

Faster doesn't always mean better. I've "learned" things from LLM really fast, but I don't retain the information the same way as if I had taken my time to really work through it

That's what the program he just took was supposed to be for, learning not output. You've just reinvented the article from first principles, congrats

He tried and messed that up too

So many comment sections on these vibe coded Show HNs are just full of obvious bots talking to each other in the most generic boring way.

At least in the novel example the author had the decency to write what they're asking you to read.

These are more like sending someone who didn't ask you a question a LMGTFY link they didn't ask for and expecting them to read all the results. Just a complete lack of awareness and respect for the maintainers

> if it works it works

If it works in one case that doesn't mean it works consistently or well in the general case

I've made lots of things with Claude Code that just work... until I do things in a slightly different order and the whole thing explodes

> It's useful context unless you've gone over the generated code and understand it and it is the same quality as if you wrote it yourself

If this is not the case you should not be sending it to public repos for review at all. It is rude and insulting to expect the people maintaining these repos to review code that nobody bothered to read.

No real reason to do that, they say Claude Code is written by Claude, which means it has no copyright. Just use the code directly

> my brain has not deteriorated now that i have offloaded that to my phone.

Is there empirical evidence that you haven't? You wouldn't necessarily be the best judge

If you were Claude you would have no emotions or thoughts about a prompt one way or another

How many dead from the US's proxy wars?

There is no way to ensure that the AI doesn't guess. You can do all the prompting and RAG you want but sometimes it's just going to make shit up and ignore instructions

Mugging victims didn't make a choice that endangered a bunch of other people that resulted in them getting mugged. Interlock devices are not given to random people for no reason.

Considering you can't have chat bots be honest even if you don't make them marketing tools I suspect I know which way companies are going to go

The only way the people who are only in it for the money leave the industry is if the money gets worse. If the money stays the same why would they leave

No, only caffeinated

> decaffeinated coffee intake was not associated with lower dementia risk or better cognitive performance

The studies compared people from the same occupation, so no, that is not likely the reason

> Since when did we restrict people's ability to do things?

At least 4000 years ago, but that's just the earliest we have evidence for

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_of_Ur-Nammu

LLMs are not people. They do not learn the way people do.

Even if they did, if someone memorized copywritten code and then typed it back out that would still be a copywrite violation

It's controlled by a guy who spends all day retweeting white supremacists and lying about his companies. Why should anyone who isn't a white supremacist use it?

What % of that is owned by employees that aren't named Elon Musk?

Are you doing a full search of every GPL licensed repository every time you use an LLM to ensure that it isn't giving you GPL licensed code? That doesn't seem reasonable

"in accordance with its license" is the key part that's missing with LLMs. The licenses are completely ignored.

> He says it's a gift, and if people do whatever, he doesn't care; he already gave it away.

That's his choice and I assume he licensed his code accordingly. That doesn't mean that the choices of others who used different licenses are invalid.