sumeno

A project that obviously bought stars on GitHub probably bought upvotes on HN too

If it's a project you actually care about and are actively working on it'll be just as good 3 months from now.

If it's something that'll be irrelevant in 3 months why should anyone care about it?

Yes.

and causing them

Yet another "Show HN" that has existed for less than a week. I wish the rules against AI generated content were applied to all these too.

If I was a betting man I'd bet that at least one of those hands is an LLM

Makes me wonder if there is a secret HN upvote economy too.

Edit: yep, quick search turned up a site to buy upvotes. All these vibe coded slop projects getting to the front page make sense now

Yes, lots of billionaires were involved with the pedophile sex trafficker. They are all bad

They're the poster child for what eventually happens when you just vibe code everything

Did Anthropic announce layoffs that I missed?

You're right, but in the US a government providing any sort of public service is an immediate target for the right (and an unfortunately significant portion of the "left"). We insist on paying more for less rather than ever allowing a poor person to benefit in a way they don't "deserve". So public transit hardly exists or is woefully inadequate in most places.

Why aren't you responding in Old English then? Surely that would be more correct since it is closer to the origin

Hopefully Sam follows in the tradition of other transformational tech figures, like Sam Bankman-Fried and Elizabeth Holmes

The billionaires controlling this aren't going to save us no matter how much wealth and power they gain.

That would require more honesty than they are capable of. Putting out a bunch of platitudes that you don't actually care about is easy enough and will convince the naive that really want to believe it already

This is the kind of attitude that is the reason it won't happen

History started well before 4 years ago

Which is why they are desperate to IPO

There is no way for a user to know whether the LLM has introspection in a given case or not, and given that the answer is almost always no it is much better for everyone to assume that they do not have introspection.

You cannot trust that the model has introspection so for all intents and purposes for the end user it doesn't.

You have a fundamental misunderstanding of what the model is doing. It's not your fault though, you're buying into the advertising of how it works

> In fact, most of the time models fail to demonstrate introspection—they’re either unaware of their internal states or unable to report on them coherently.

You got the wrong takeaway from your link.

Why are you employable if the AI does everything for you?

They would have to tell people if they did that.

If I say "Ted is the Unibomber" do you think I'm saying everyone named Ted is the Unibomber? This is basic reading comprehension stuff

If you write in your diary "I'm gonna kill her" and then she gets killed it's relevant

Given the research cited in the article it seems bigger than an anecdote about one guy who doesn't know how to do work life balance

70%+ saying that AI has increased their workload AND that they are burning out because is it.

You assume CEOs are completely rational actors.

The reality is most of them are so divorced from reality that they think they are infallible and AI will pick up the slack because they want it to be true.

More like where the bread will come from if nobody learns how to bake it and the knowledge of how to bake it is lost.

Or $200,000 for consumers when they have to make a profit

It's very funny that you're giving a RTFM response to a video you admit you didn't watch.

WTFV