328 karma · joined January 9, 2015
This might be true.
> Most of what the volunteer moderators do is remove content that they feel is not in line with their community.
This is certainly not true for my sub. There's a lot of obvious spam that has to be manually removed. For example, if Reddit enforced the selfpromotion ratio rule programmatically, there'd be an order of magnitude less spam to deal with.
---
Unless Reddit cranks up the removal rate, moderators are still necessary or the /new feed will drown in spam. If /new drowns in spam, what reaches the top will become a lot more chaotic.
Given the pressure from revenue objectives, it will be hard for Reddit to identify and prioritize the right safeguards. Failure here would lead to a more homogenous Reddit.
You make a good point about leverage.
There's no avoiding this in any group.
It's not that people are making up their restaurant visits.
It's that they are going to the restaurant, they had a good time, but they didn't disclose that they are close to the owner, and maybe they overlooked a few things here and there that an impartial reviewer would note.
Many small businesses get their viral loop started from glowing reviews from family and friends. That sort of growth hack will never disappear, and the subtle cases will be undetectable. I decline to write such reviews, but others won't.
Somehow it never occurs to them that unmoderated platforms end up at best like 4chan and at worst like a site that gets shut down by the FBI.
I bought a fancy TWSBI with different inks only to discover that my favorite ink was the Pilot Varsity blue. So now I just use the Varsity.
I like Internet communities and am willing to volunteer some time to help some be more successful.
We're not there yet.
The day to day is mostly deciding whether borderline comments should be removed and whether a post contains too much self-promotion.
They'd probably have to charge $10-20/mo just to break even.
Modding is about to get a lot harder.