stevenalowe

EA has been saddled with a heavy load on their way to the bottom. Private equity firms are not known for their innovation or longevity

It is illegal for the President to sell this access and also illegal for recipients to act upon the information received.

But who will enforce the law? Not the DOJ…

Replace LLM with “intern” and the absurdity should be more obvious

The fact that we can’t trust the code outright is a bug

No, AI misinformation and data center hysteria are dividing people.

yes they are while simultaneously warning that their models may be inaccurate - trying to have it both ways!

the purpose of this war is not to win, but to distract

yes but it seems likely that the user asked it to generate (hallucinate) a map, not annotate an actual map

one would be well-advised to proofread everything from stochastic generator tools

seems odd/inefficient that it would hallucinate a bad map instead of retrieving an actual map!

can't blame OpenAI for hallucinating a map, that's what it's good for - can blame officials for not proofreading it though

startup idea: a social media platform where illogical or false statements are rejected with an annotated refutation

it would be a very quiet place...

this - if trustworthy - would be great for social media and "news" sites

Link to article instead of a tweet about the article :/ [1]

[1] https://www.politico.com/news/2026/07/28/openai-rogue-models...

yes please - better yet, train your own ACM model on it

Your product will never be found by keyword.

"Set Grok aside and the other fifteen models all sit in the libertarian-left quadrant, and none of them are anywhere near a border"

Because the models are the average of everything they've read. LLMs do not make decisions, they predict the next word.

from 2009: "I no longer believe that freedom and democracy are compatible."

"...Trump officials handpicked the potential recipients, decisions previously made by a panel of government experts who evaluated applicants based on the organizations’ experience and qualifications."

none of the established official processes were followed

Yet another attempted blatant HIPAA violation this time via the Consumer Product Safety Commission

How often do driverless cars crash into each other? Seems like a better proxy for the future, i.e. if there were no human drivers would the crash rate be zero?

the real reason is: he's lying. Claims that funds were shifted to 'other agencies' that 'could have' prevented things, but didn't, in an attempt to obscure the fact/admission that DOGE's cuts directly resulted in many preventable deaths.

The author states that the subtext is that only people we don't care about died, which seems an interpretation not a literal quote.

Disturbing to hear that even as an American citizen I only have rights when I'm on the ground in specific sovereign territory, of which the border (which is obviously American soil) is exempted.

With respect to the phone, I'd say one has the right to delete everything on one's phone at any time. There is no evidence that the person in question was "destroying evidence" because there was no evidence - or suspicion, or charges, or anything substantive.

I think the authorities just got ticked off by the duress password, and they're flinging mud.

dang, sorry

sure seems like a lot of 'em have

no, bats also yell at each other using individualized sounds [1]

[1] https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/researchers-transl...

sorry, not buying it

related: https://memepediadankmemes.fandom.com/wiki/Old_Man_Yells_at_...

Introducing...a feature no one actually wants, that opens a brand new security attack surface. Much wow.

when a clown moves into the palace, the palace becomes a circus

No. The tea party was a clown show, no reason to expect anything different from this

"The protests were coordinated by HumansFirst, co-founded by a former leader of the modern-day Tea Party."

Stopped reading there.