sorokod

or even a bunch of characters, bunch of pixels and so on.

To me this is the wrong level of abstraction that is not sufficient to encode the meaning of literature.

I different interesting question: why would we want to inhabit this universal room in the first place? The post mentions the idea of being "bigger than yourself" but to me the context collapse achieves the opposite - a sort of carboard caricature of oneself.

Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away.

"a person who makes calculations, especially with a calculating machine."

Google ngram view:

https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=computer&year_...

https://www.theguardian.com/books/2026/jun/17/morbid-by-saul...

She stopped using that name.

Talking is cheap, but even talk is better then the impotent call for "people outside."

Olah argues that "if we want this technology to go well, it is enormously important that there be people outside those incentives."

That sounds part hypocritical and part evasive; the responsibility starts with the people inside the incentives — with him.

Aren't crocodiles and dinosaurs seperarte branches ?

They say that history rhimes.

True, but the legal system didn't look fondly on outlawing jaywalking, until it did. Took it about 20 years in the US.

U.S. Is Not a Piggy Bank for Europe’s Socialist Policies

https://waysandmeans.house.gov/2024/03/11/u-s-is-not-a-piggy...

"And if his story really is a confession, then so is mine."

...now it is complete

Gauss worked out some sort of probability distribution too.